No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Hashem (ה׳) speak all Ten Commandments simultaneously at Sinai if no one could understand them? The shiur presents a yesod that Ma'amad Har Sinai was fundamentally about hearing Hashem's voice—an act of connection and spiritual marriage—not about receiving laws. This explains why the nations were offered written law while only Klal Yisrael experienced the kol itself, which recreated and healed them.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a series of profound questions about Ma'amad Har Sinai that reveal the fundamental nature of the Sinai experience. The shiur begins with several puzzling elements: Why does the Torah (תורה) omit the chronologically appropriate account of Hashem (ה׳) offering the Torah to the nations (mentioned only in V'zos HaBracha) from Parshas Yisro? Why did Hashem perform the seemingly unnecessary miracle of curing all blind, deaf, lame, and mute individuals at Sinai? And most perplexing, why did Hashem speak all Ten Commandments simultaneously when, as Rashi (רש"י) explains, this made understanding impossible? The core question centers on Rashi's statement that Hashem first spoke all ten dibros "b'dibur echad"—simultaneously—which no human mouth could speak. Critically, Rashi does not say that a miracle was performed enabling people to hear simultaneously; only that the speaking was miraculous. This raises the fundamental question: what is the purpose of a miracle that produces speech no one can comprehend? If Hashem wanted to perform miracles, why not enable simultaneous hearing as well, as He did with "zachor v'shamor" and with the first two dibros heard "mipi hagevurah"?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why do Yisro and Mishpatim present such different accounts of Sinai - one fearful and trembling, the other celebratory? Both represent essential dimensions of Kabbalas HaTorah that occurred simultaneously. Yisro captures divine imposition establishing non-negotiable obligation, while Mishpatim represents the covenantal relationship enabling "na'aseh v'nishma."
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 19-20, Parshas Yisro
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why did Hashem give both the Ten Commandments on tablets and the Sefer Torah when both contain identical words? The shiur develops a yesod that Sinai involved two distinct dimensions: divine commands requiring obedience based on relationship (tablets), and written Torah for intellectual study (sefer). This explains differences in Torah reading practices and reveals that true freedom comes from following commands through love rather than reasoned understanding.
