No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) phrase lending money conditionally—"If you lend"—when it's an obligation? The shiur explores a Midrash teaching that wealth, power, and wisdom are genuinely ours to enjoy, but precisely because they're ours, they make us threats to others. Lending money—which offers minimal personal benefit—is the litmus test proving we'll use our gifts to help rather than dominate.
Rabbi Zweig examines the pasuk in Mishpatim "Im kesef talveh es ami" (If you lend money to My people), asking why the Torah (תורה) uses conditional language ("if") when lending money is actually an obligation. He notes that while Chazal in the Mechilta say "im" here means obligation despite its usual conditional meaning, the Rambam (רמב"ם) appears to learn that this pasuk itself is genuinely conditional, requiring another pasuk to establish the obligation. This raises the question: why does the Torah phrase an obligation conditionally? The shiur then explores a Midrash Tanchuma that connects this pasuk to Kohelet's statement about "wealth guarded for its owner to his harm." The Midrash teaches that God tests wealthy people through whether they open their hands to the poor, particularly through lending money. The poor are also tested on whether they accept their situation without complaint. Those who pass receive reward in the world to come, while the wealthy who fail are destroyed along with their wealth. The Midrash brings examples: Korach (wealth used for harm), Goliath (strength used for harm), and Bilam (wisdom used for harm) all died horrible deaths, while Yehoshaphat (wealth), Dovid (strength), and Yehoshua (wisdom) used their gifts properly and benefited from them.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Mishpatim (Shemos 22:24)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!