No community start suggestion yet.
Does reading Torah (תורה) without understanding the words have any value? The Shelah HaKadosh distinguishes between Torah sheb'kesav and Torah sheb'al peh: written Torah retains value even without comprehension because the words themselves are holy, while oral Torah requires understanding to have meaning. This insight explains Rashi (רש"י)'s puzzling commentary on 'in your mouth and in your heart.'
This shiur examines a fundamental question about Torah (תורה) learning: whether there is value in studying texts without understanding their meaning. The discussion centers on a difficult Rashi (רש"י) in Parshas Nitzavim, where the Torah states that it is 'very close to you, in your mouth and in your heart, to do it.' Rashi explains that 'in your mouth' refers to Torah sheb'kesav (the Written Torah), which seems counterintuitive since we would normally associate oral recitation with Torah sheb'al peh (the Oral Torah). To resolve this difficulty, Rabbi Zweig presents a profound teaching from the Shelah HaKadosh that distinguishes between the nature of written and oral Torah study. According to the Shelah, Torah sheb'kesav possesses intrinsic holiness in its very words and letters. Therefore, even when a person reads or recites the written Torah without understanding its meaning, there is still spiritual value in the act itself. This applies to reading Chumash, Tehillim, or any biblical text - the Hebrew words themselves carry sacred power regardless of comprehension level.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Torah repeat that Rivka came from a family of manipulators and wicked people? The shiur argues that this is not "despite" her background but rather her yichus—she inherited their extraordinary sensitivity to others' needs but channeled it toward chesed rather than manipulation. True kindness requires understanding what the recipient actually needs, not just what the giver wants to give.
Why did Avrohom ask for visible signs of old age when people were already growing old? The shiur develops the principle that Avrohom requested that aging reflect not just physical decline but accumulated wisdom and compassion. This dignity of age is the foundation for transmitting values across generations—and its absence explains both the sin of the spies and the breakdown of contemporary families.
Parshas Nitzavim 30:14
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
