A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why is kalah b'lo bracha a more stringent prohibition than muberis chaveiro, to the point that one issur cannot serve as a shemirah for the other? The shiur explores whether the distinction lies in the nature of gezeirah versus issur, in the special stringency of sakana (danger to life), or in the conceptual difference between a prohibition and a requirement to perform an action first.
This Gemara (גמרא) shiur on Yevamos 36b tackles Tosafos (תוספות)'s question regarding why kalah b'lo bracha (marriage before sheva brachos) is treated as a more stringent prohibition than muberis chaveiro (being with a pregnant woman from another man), such that the issur of muberis chaveiro cannot serve as a shemirah (safeguard) for kalah b'lo bracha. The shiur presents multiple approaches to understanding this distinction, emphasizing the methodology of stopping to develop one's own hesber before looking at Tosafos's answer. The first approach distinguishes between gezeirah and issur. A gezeirah is something intrinsically permissible that Chazal prohibited lest it lead to an actual issur. An issur d'Rabbanan, by contrast, may create an intrinsic prohibition—a chefetz of issur—not merely a protective fence. This distinction appears in halachos Shabbos (שבת), where there are differences between melachos d'Rabbanan (rabbinic prohibitions that are intrinsically forbidden acts) and gezeiros d'Rabbanan (protective decrees). The question raised is whether muberis chaveiro is a gezeirah (protection against potential harm to the child) while kalah b'lo bracha is an issur (violation of the requirement for sheva brachos). If so, perhaps the Chachamim are more stringent about actual issurim than about gezeiros, making kalah b'lo bracha the more serious prohibition.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Yevamos 36b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.
