A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why may one tell a non-Jew on Shabbos (שבת) to write a legal document for acquiring land in Eretz Yisrael? The Gemara (גמרא)'s formulation seems backwards—it cites amira l'akum as a reason to forbid, yet permits it. The Rambam (רמב"ם) resolves this by distinguishing two separate prohibitions: making Shabbos "light" (divrei soferim, waived for mitzvah (מצוה) needs) and the concern one might come to do melacha oneself (a shevus, waived only for tzorchei klal Yisrael).
This shiur analyzes Gittin 8b, which permits telling a non-Jew on Shabbos (שבת) to write a shtar (legal document) for acquiring land in Eretz Yisrael. Rabbi Zweig begins by noting the Gemara (גמרא)'s peculiar language: "lo gazar bei rabanan" (the Rabbis did not decree). The formulation is puzzling—did the Sages really sit down and enumerate specific exceptions to amira l'akum (asking a non-Jew to perform a forbidden act on Shabbos)? Such an unusual case seems unlikely to have been explicitly considered when the gezeira was made. The Gemara should have said it's permitted despite being a shevus because of the importance of settling Eretz Yisrael, yet instead it uses the language of "lo gazar." The shiur presents a fundamental disagreement between the Rosh and Rivash versus the Shulchan Aruch regarding whether one may make a kinyan (act of acquisition) on Shabbos itself. According to the Magen Avrohom, the Rosh and Rivash hold that while amira l'akum for writing is permitted, the kinyan itself must occur either before or after Shabbos, not on Shabbos. The distinction rests on the difference between a shevus she'ein bo ma'aseh (a rabbinic prohibition without a physical action, like amira l'akum) and one with a ma'aseh (like performing a kinyan). The Shulchan Aruch, however, permits even making the kinyan on Shabbos.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Gittin 8b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.