No community start suggestion yet.
Why do the laws of Hebrew servants open Parshas Mishpatim's social justice section? The Torah (תורה) targets theft specifically because thieves avoid responsibility by acting secretly, revealing a slave mentality. The six-year servitude teaches responsibility through immediate, complete restitution rather than mere punishment.
This shiur examines the opening laws of Parshas Mishpatim, specifically the laws of the Hebrew servant (eved ivri), and why they begin the social justice section despite seeming relatively minor compared to laws of murder or theft. Rabbi Zweig explains that these laws were part of the Sinaitic experience itself, not just given at Sinai, because they establish the fundamental principle of teaching personal responsibility rather than merely controlling behavior. The analysis focuses on why only theft, among all crimes requiring restitution, results in selling the perpetrator into servitude when he cannot pay. The key insight is that theft differs from robbery or battery in that the thief attempts to avoid taking responsibility for his actions - he steals secretly, hoping not to be caught or identified. This indicates a slave mentality, someone unwilling to own up to consequences.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Mishpatim 21:2-6
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!