No community start suggestion yet.
How can the Torah (תורה) permit a Jewish soldier to take a beautiful captive woman, seemingly surrendering to the yetzer hara? The elaborate process required actually minimizes spiritual self-damage by preventing the act from being purely desire-driven. This connects to why Lashon Hara is framed as causing tzaraas - speech articulates the soul, and using it to legitimize base emotions corrupts our internal spiritual structure.
This shiur examines two seemingly disparate topics - the laws of Yefas Toar (beautiful captive woman) and the prohibition against Lashon Hara (evil speech) - through the lens of understanding how sins affect the sinner himself, not just others. The discussion begins with the fundamental question of how the Torah (תורה) could permit a Jewish soldier to live with a non-Jewish captive woman, given that this appears to be surrendering to the yetzer hara (evil inclination). Chazal explain this with the principle 'lo dibra Torah ela k'neged yetzer hara' - the Torah spoke only in response to the evil inclination. Rav Zweig challenges the conventional understanding of this principle, arguing that it doesn't mean the Torah permits the act because of the yetzer hara, but rather that the Torah provides a framework to minimize the spiritual damage the permitted act might cause to the person. The elaborate process of making the captive woman unattractive (shaving her hair, letting her mourn) serves to reduce the yetzer hara's influence and prevent the act from being purely driven by physical desire.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Ki Seitzei
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!