No community start suggestion yet.
How can the Torah (תורה) permit a Jewish soldier to take a beautiful captive woman, seemingly surrendering to the yetzer hara? The elaborate process required actually minimizes spiritual self-damage by preventing the act from being purely desire-driven. This connects to why Lashon Hara is framed as causing tzaraas - speech articulates the soul, and using it to legitimize base emotions corrupts our internal spiritual structure.
This shiur examines two seemingly disparate topics - the laws of Yefas Toar (beautiful captive woman) and the prohibition against Lashon Hara (evil speech) - through the lens of understanding how sins affect the sinner himself, not just others. The discussion begins with the fundamental question of how the Torah (תורה) could permit a Jewish soldier to live with a non-Jewish captive woman, given that this appears to be surrendering to the yetzer hara (evil inclination). Chazal explain this with the principle 'lo dibra Torah ela k'neged yetzer hara' - the Torah spoke only in response to the evil inclination. Rav Zweig challenges the conventional understanding of this principle, arguing that it doesn't mean the Torah permits the act because of the yetzer hara, but rather that the Torah provides a framework to minimize the spiritual damage the permitted act might cause to the person. The elaborate process of making the captive woman unattractive (shaving her hair, letting her mourn) serves to reduce the yetzer hara's influence and prevent the act from being purely driven by physical desire.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Ki Seitzei
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
