No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) add that the widow won't receive her kesuvah and the orphans won't inherit when their husband/father is killed for oppressing widows and orphans? The shiur develops the idea that a person who oppresses the vulnerable lacks sensitivity precisely because his own family never showed him how deeply they depend on him. Therefore, the family shares responsibility and loses their normal inheritance rights.
The shiur analyzes the Torah (תורה)'s seemingly redundant statement in Parshas Mishpatim regarding the punishment for oppressing widows and orphans. The Torah states that if someone oppresses a widow or orphan and they cry out to Hashem (ה׳), He will kill the oppressor, and "your wives will be widows and your children will be orphans." This appears redundant—obviously if someone dies, his wife becomes a widow and his children become orphans. Rashi (רש"י), citing Chazal, explains that the redundancy conveys an additional punishment: the oppressor's body will not be found, preventing his wife from collecting her kesuvah (marriage settlement) and his children from receiving their inheritance. Normally, when a person dies, the wife receives her kesuvah and the children inherit. But here, without proof of death, the wife and children suffer financial consequences beyond the typical outcome.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Mishpatim - Shemos 22:21-23
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
