A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) juxtapose the law against building steps to the altar with the opening laws of Mishpatim concerning judges? The shiur argues that taking large steps creates awareness of one's physicality, which compromises spiritual focus. Similarly, a judge must avoid self-awareness and personal agenda—including taking bribes "for fairness"—because self-focus blinds him to truth and objectivity.
Rabbi Zweig opens with the classical question of juxtaposition: why does Parshas Mishpatim, which begins with laws requiring Jewish courts, follow immediately after the law forbidding steps on the altar (so "your nakedness not be uncovered")? Rashi (רש"י) explains that although the Kohen wore pants under his tunic, taking wide steps is "close to exposing nakedness." The halacha (הלכה) therefore requires a ramp, not steps, and mandates that the Kohen walk with small steps—heel of the forward foot not extending beyond the toe of the rear foot. The Midrash connects this to the opening of Mishpatim: judges must not take "big steps" in judgment. Commentators typically explain this as a call for deliberation and care. Rabbi Zweig challenges this reading: the expression "big steps" (pesi'ah gasah) does not naturally refer to speed or deliberation; it refers to the size and nature of the step itself. The word "gasah" means crude or coarse, not merely large.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Mishpatim (Shemos 21:1) and end of Yisro (Shemos 20:23)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
Why does Rashi describe Avrohom and Ephron's land deal as happening "between friends" when they just met? The shiur develops the principle that overpaying transforms business transactions into expressions of friendship and respect. Great people habitually overpay to ensure no one feels exploited, creating "lekach tov" situations where both parties benefit with dignity.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
