A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
If both wise and wicked die, why choose wisdom? Shlomo HaMelech's answer reveals a dual perspective on creation: God creates for our benefit, but our purpose is to serve as His ambassadors. The difference between wise and wicked becomes clear only after death, when we can judge whether their conflicts promoted divine values or mere ego.
Rabbi Zweig analyzes a profound philosophical question from Shlomo HaMelech in Koheles 2:15: if both the wise and wicked die, why choose wisdom? The seemingly trivial answer - that the wise are remembered for good while the wicked are not - contains deep theological insights about humanity's purpose in creation. The shiur begins by examining the Talmudic debate in Eruvin 13b where Beis Shammai and Beis Hillel argued for two and a half years whether it's better to be created or not, concluding it would be better not to be created. This appears to contradict the fundamental Jewish principle that God created the world purely for humanity's benefit. Rabbi Zweig resolves this through a crucial distinction between perspectives in relationships.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Koheles 2:15
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Hashkafa
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did Shlomo HaMelech despair over his life's work being inherited by his wicked son Rechavam? The shiur draws from Koheles 2:17-21 to argue that success cannot be measured by outcomes we don't control, since free will is fundamental to God's design. True success lies in creating optimal environments and being proper examples, not in numerical results or external appearances.
Why should we not rejoice in wealth, yet the Talmud treats stealing even a penny as equivalent to murder? The shiur resolves this through two competing philosophies: Esav's "I have more than I need" treats money as personal pleasure, while Yaakov's "I have everything" sees money as a divine test of moral choice. Theft is severe because it removes someone's ability to exercise these divinely-appointed choices, not because it reduces physical comfort.
Why does Koheles speak of both zman (designated time) and eis (present moment) in spiritual matters? The shiur develops that zman represents God's invitation while eis represents our response, and their intersection creates moed - actual relationship rather than mere spiritual exercise. True avodah requires divine partnership, just as bris milah needed God's command because covenants cannot be unilateral.
Why did Klal Yisrael need coercion at Har Sinai yet voluntary acceptance at Purim? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: true kabbalas haTorah means recognizing that mitzvos reflect who we already are—not a choice we make, but our inner essence programmed by Hashem. At Purim, through hester panim, we internalized that doing ratzon Hashem requires no decision, only allowing ourselves to be who we truly are.
Why does the Rambam cite two different pesukim for the mitzvah of building the Beis Hamikdash? The shiur develops the yesod that the Mishkan serves two distinct purposes: a place for avodah and the seat of HaKadosh Baruch Hu's malchus. Achashverosh's party attempted to transfer that malchus to the nations, but Purim's kabbalas HaTorah b'ratzon restored our eternal claim.
Why did the Aron not take up any space in the Kodesh HaKodashim? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod: the Mishkan's ultimate purpose was not merely to house holy vessels but to create "His space"—a place where we experience being contained within Hashem's reality rather than Him existing within ours. This transforms our understanding of aliyah l'regel, the batei knesiyos, and our entire relationship with kedusha.
Why did Haman, who had wealth, power, and family beyond measure, declare all of it worthless upon merely seeing Mordechai? The shiur unpacks Esther 5:13 to reveal that Haman's statement exposes the inherent emptiness of a life connected only to the self and temporal possessions. Mordechai's willingness to sacrifice his life for values demonstrated connection to the eternal, shattering Haman's denial and forcing him to confront his own nothingness—a devastating truth that explains Jewish depression rates and points to the antidote: rootedness in Torah, prayer, and connection to something beyond the self.
