A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Rashi (רש"י) cite two separate pesukim to teach that no one was blind at Har Sinai? The shiur distinguishes between physical blemish (missing an eye) and functional impairment (inability to see). Hashem (ה׳) performed two distinct miracles: restoring physical completeness ("le'einei kol ha'am") and restoring all functions of sight, hearing, and speech ("ro'im es hakolos").
The shiur analyzes an apparent redundancy in Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on the giving of the Torah (תורה) at Har Sinai. In Shemos 19:11, Rashi comments on the phrase "le'einei kol ha'am" (before the eyes of all the people) and teaches that there was no blind person among them—everyone was healed. Later, in Shemos 20:15 (or 20:18 in some editions), Rashi again comments on "v'chol ha'am ro'im" (and all the people saw) to teach the same point: that no one was blind, deaf, or mute. The question emerges: why does Rashi need to cite this teaching twice? Rabbi Zweig initially considers whether the first Rashi refers to a promise before Matan Torah and the second to the actual fulfillment afterward. However, he rejects this explanation because the proof-texts Rashi brings for the absence of mutes and deaf people ("vaya'anu kol ha'am" and "na'aseh v'nishma") both occur before the actual giving of the Torah, not after. Therefore, both Rashis are discussing the same time period.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Shemos 19:11, 20:15 (Yisro)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did Potiphar's wife pursue Yosef, and what does Rashi mean when he calls her actions "leshem shamayim"? The shiur argues she correctly saw in astrology that she and Yosef would have a child—an unchangeable decree for most people. But as a descendant of Avrohom, whom Hashem lifted above the stars, Yosef possessed the unique power to bend astrological fate, transforming the prediction into fulfillment through her daughter (Osnas) instead.
Why did Hashem cure all the sick, blind, deaf, and lame before Matan Torah? The Rambam teaches that miracles require purpose. This shiur argues that the mass healing demonstrated that Torah is not meant for the downtrodden seeking comfort, but for healthy people who can fully channel their energies toward mitzvos and serve as proper examples to their communities.
Why does the Aramaic word for "accept" (Kabbalah) also mean "complain"? The shiur develops a profound insight: genuine acceptance only emerges from overcoming resistance. Without internal challenge, an idea merely passes through us—true commitment is born only when we wrestle with, resist, and ultimately decide to embrace a principle.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
