No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) prohibit bribes even when the giver claims he only wants a fair judgment? The shiur explores how the most dangerous corruption comes not from obvious payoffs but from those who present themselves as righteous, wanting only justice. This subtle manipulation blinds judges by creating favorable impressions rather than direct influence.
The shiur examines the prohibition against taking bribes found in Parshas Shoftim, particularly focusing on cases where the bribe-giver claims to want only fair judgment rather than a favorable outcome. Rabbi Zweig argues that there are two levels of bribery prohibited by the Torah (תורה): the obvious case in Parshas Mishpatim where someone pays for a favorable verdict, and the more subtle case in Parshas Shoftim. The discussion centers on Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary explaining why even well-intentioned bribes corrupt judgment. Rashi states that once a judge accepts money from someone, he will inevitably search for ways to rule in that person's favor. Rabbi Zweig explores why this psychological reality holds true even when the giver explicitly states he wants to lose if he's wrong.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Shoftim - bribery prohibition
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
