No community start suggestion yet.
How can the word "azov" mean both "abandon" and "help" when these are opposite concepts? The Torah (תורה)'s command of "azov taazov imo" reveals that true help means empowering someone to stand independently. Real assistance requires the ability to let go—otherwise you cripple rather than enable.
The shiur addresses a linguistic and conceptual paradox in Parshas Mishpatim regarding the mitzvah (מצוה) of helping someone unload an overburdened animal. The Torah (תורה) uses the term "azov taazov imo" to describe this obligation of prikah (unloading). The difficulty is that the root word "azov" consistently means "to abandon" throughout Tanach—as in "al kein yaazov ish et aviv v'et imo" (therefore a man shall leave his father and mother) and "lo yaazov tzaddik" (the righteous one will not be abandoned). How can the same root word mean both "help" and "abandon," which are conceptually opposite? This question takes on particular significance in Lashon HaKodesh (Hebrew), where words are not arbitrary labels as they are in other languages. In English, an object could be called "chair" or "table" interchangeably—these are mere conventions. But in Hebrew, the words themselves create and define reality. The word "kisei" created the very concept of a chair; "shulchan" created the concept of a table. The letters and words of Lashon HaKodesh are the building blocks of reality itself. Given this fundamental nature of Hebrew, it seems impossible for the same root to carry two opposite meanings (davar v'hepucho). If the word defines the reality, what reality is being defined when "azov" can mean both abandonment and assistance?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos 23:5 (Parshas Mishpatim - azov taazov imo)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.
