No community start suggestion yet.
How could the Jewish people blame the erev rav for the golden calf when each person is responsible for their own choices? The erev rav's decision to join the exodus gave wavering Jews validation that leaving Egypt wasn't foolish, creating psychological influence that Pharaoh deliberately exploited. This dynamic explains why whoever gives someone confidence gains power over them.
This shiur provides a profound analysis of Shir HaShirim 1:5-6, focusing on the verse 'Shechora ani v'nava bnos Yerushalayim' (I am black but beautiful, daughters of Jerusalem). Rabbi Zweig explains that the blackness represents external corruption rather than internal nature, caused by the sun's scorching rather than inherent defect. The phrase 'bnei imi nicharu bi' (the children of my mother incited me) refers to Egypt as the 'mother' where the Jewish people were forged into a nation during 400 years of slavery. The 'bnei imi' specifically refers to the erev rav (mixed multitude) who convinced the Jews to worship the golden calf. Rabbi Zweig addresses a fundamental question: how can one blame others for their own sins? He explains that while 80% of Jews didn't want to leave Egypt, preferring the honor and wealth there to an uncertain desert journey, the remaining 20% who followed divine command had doubts about their decision's logic. The erev rav's crucial role was providing validation - their willingness to join the exodus gave the Jews confidence that their decision wasn't insane. This validation created tremendous power over the Jewish people, as whoever gives a person confidence in themselves gains influence over them. Pharaoh understood this dynamic and encouraged the erev rav to join the exodus as his final strategy to destroy the Jewish people spiritually after failing physically. The shiur then transitions to a complex halachic analysis comparing the Mikdash's role in shofar versus lulav laws. Rabbi Zweig distinguishes between two functions of the Mikdash: as a place of divine service (avodah) and as the center of national unity. For matters of national unity like tekias shofar (which represents God's kingship), Jerusalem shares the Mikdash's status. However, for pure service matters like lulav waving, only the actual Mikdash qualifies. This analysis resolves apparent contradictions in the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s rulings and explains why different mitzvos have different geographical requirements.
Shir HaShirim 1:5-6
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Navi
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Was the Golden Calf simply idolatry, or something more specific? The shiur argues it was actually a rejection of Torah She'be'al Peh - choosing surface-level observance over deep understanding. Galus serves as the ultimate tikkun by forcing Jews to consciously seek Torah wisdom to explain their distinct practices.
Why does Shir HaShirim 1:9 link divine love specifically to Kriyas Yam Suf? The shiur distinguishes between Hashem acting through middos (via malachim) versus direct divine appearances. Kriyas Yam Suf marked the first time Hashem personally intervened rather than working through messengers, demonstrating His special chibah for Klal Yisrael.
How can Hashem declare us beautiful immediately after the golden calf sin? The shiur develops the principle that true love requires each partner to prioritize the other - Hashem says our existence is worth His pain from our sins, while we should feel unworthy of causing Him embarrassment. This mutual selflessness creates the 'verdant bed' of shalom bayis that nurtures healthy growth.
Why did Hashem insist on giving us Eretz Yisrael rather than creating a new land for us? The shiur explores a Midrash that claims Hashem wanted to show His power by defeating our enemies. This creates an ongoing divine commitment to protect us in a hostile environment where the nations perceive us as thieves of their land.
Why did Shlomo HaMelech combine intellect, physical pleasure, and chukim after each approach individually failed? The shiur develops that humans must acknowledge both their physical nature and spiritual capacity simultaneously. Chukim (called "foolishness" here) teach us to act for internal meaning rather than external approval.
Why does Kohelet frame foolish words differently as beginning versus end? The shiur develops a yesod distinguishing empowering communication from controlling communication. Manipulation destroys human dignity by removing free choice, making it worse than giving bad advice that preserves bechirah.
How can Israel be both "black" and "beautiful" simultaneously, as described in Shir HaShirim? The shiur uses Rashi's insight to reveal a fundamental difference between divine and human relationships. While people focus on recent failures and forget past goodness, God sees Israel's essential beauty intact even after transgressions like the Golden Calf.
