No community start suggestion yet.
If speaking truth is valued, why is lashon hara forbidden even when the information is accurate? The shiur develops that true emes means respecting others' realities and perceptions. Speaking negative truths destroys relationships where those flaws weren't problematic, unnecessarily damaging both listener and subject by forcing awareness of what didn't bother them before.
This profound shiur examines one of the 13 attributes of Divine mercy found in Sefer Michah: "Yirachamenu" - He will again have compassion upon us. The lecture begins by contrasting human and Divine responses to repentance. While humans typically maintain some residual hurt even after forgiveness, God shows increased love to the penitent, as expressed in the teaching that "in the place where penitents stand, the perfectly righteous cannot stand" (b'mokom sheba'alei teshuvah omdim, ein tzadikim gemurim yecholim la'amod). The Chochmah explains this through the mystical understanding of the letter Hey, which shaped like an exedra (open courtyard), represents how the world is open to sin but also provides an opening for return through repentance. The core of the shiur addresses a fundamental question about lashon hara (evil speech): if speaking truth is valued, why is it forbidden to speak truthful but disparaging information about others? The answer lies in understanding the true nature of emes (truth). Every person lives in their own reality and perception of the world. Just as people have different tastes in art, homes, or careers, they also have different ways of relating to other people's character traits and flaws.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Mussar
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the divine attribute 'Yichbosh Avonoseinu' suppress rather than simply forgive sins? The shiur uses the Ramak's framework to show that humans instinctively claim credit for good while blaming others for bad, opposite to Hashem's approach. Developing security in our inherent worth allows us to properly take responsibility for failures while crediting others for their contributions.
How can sins be "cast away" if we committed them? The shiur uses the Ramak's explanation of Tashlich to develop a yesod that sins are external to our essence, not inherent flaws - evidenced by the Torah's careful language with Yishmael versus the ben sorer u'moreh. This understanding transforms both teshuvah and how we view spiritual failures.
What distinguishes divine emes (truth/justice) from chesed (kindness), and why are they linked to Yaakov and Avrohom respectively? True chesed involves giving without any expectation of benefit, recognition, or logical return - a godly trait that only those who share divine nature can genuinely achieve. The Sodom mentality represents the opposite: preventing others' benefit even at no personal cost, revealing complete absence of this divine characteristic.
Why does the Rambam place free will exclusively in Hilchos Teshuva rather than Yesodei HaTorah? The shiur argues that teshuva begins not with correcting specific sins but with recognizing that free choice grants us ability, not right—we must abandon the arrogance of self-centeredness and reposition Hashem at the universe's center. Only then can we achieve immediate closeness to Him.
Why is vidui (confession) the central mitzvah in Hilchos Teshuvah, rather than teshuvah itself? The Rambam distinguishes between teshuvah (establishing a prospective relationship with Hashem) and vidui (achieving kapara for the past). Vidui transforms the focus from self-improvement to recognizing Hashem as the "baal davar"—the injured party—and communicating directly to Him, which is what undoes yesterday's aveiros.
Why does the Rambam locate the essence of teshuvah in vidui (confession) rather than behavioral change? The shiur explores how vidui works even for shogeg (unintentional sin), showing that confession restores relationship with God even when one has pushed Him out of one's world. The connection between vidui and todah (thanks) reveals the deeper meaning of confession.
What does kapara really mean—erasing the sin or restoring the sinner? The shiur builds on Rambam Hilchos Teshuvah 1:3 to argue that kapara is not about making sins disappear but about going forward in a relationship with Hashem. The story of Yishmael read on Rosh Hashanah—"ba'asher hu shom"—teaches that the din focuses on who we are now, not on fixing the past.
