A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why is vidui (confession) the central mitzvah (מצוה) in Hilchos Teshuvah, rather than teshuvah itself? The Rambam (רמב"ם) distinguishes between teshuvah (establishing a prospective relationship with Hashem (ה׳)) and vidui (achieving kapara for the past). Vidui transforms the focus from self-improvement to recognizing Hashem as the "baal davar"—the injured party—and communicating directly to Him, which is what undoes yesterday's aveiros.
This foundational shiur explores the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s treatment of teshuvah in Hilchos Teshuvah, beginning with a striking difficulty: the Rambam calls the section "Hilchos Teshuvah," yet the only mitzvah (מצוה) he identifies is vidui (confession). In Perek Alef, halacha (הלכה) aleph, the Rambam writes that when a person does teshuvah, he is obligated to confess—"vidui zeh mitzvas aseh." This appears counterintuitive, since vidui seems peripheral compared to the heart-based work of genuine repentance. The shiur systematically addresses several fundamental questions: Why is vidui the mitzvah and not teshuvah? How can vidui be effective without genuine inner commitment? And how can a person become a tzaddik gamur through teshuvah alone, as the Gemara (גמרא) in Kiddushin suggests, without vidui? The Rambam himself appears internally inconsistent. In the Sefer HaMitzvos, he writes that the mitzvah is "sheyashuv hachotei mecheto lifnei Hashem (ה׳) v'yisvada"—that the sinner shall do teshuvah before Hashem and confess. This formulation includes both teshuvah and vidui. Yet in the body of Hilchos Teshuvah, the Rambam states that when one does teshuvah, he is obligated to confess, implying that the obligation is only vidui, not teshuvah itself. Furthermore, in Perek Beis, the Rambam goes out of his way to bring a pasuk—"modeh v'ozev yerucham"—to teach that confession without genuine resolve is ineffective, like immersing in a mikvah while holding a sheretz. This is puzzling: why would we need a special teaching to tell us that words without inner commitment are meaningless?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Hilchos Teshuvah 1:1, 2:2
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Mussar
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Rambam frame teshuva around vidui rather than behavioral change? The shiur develops the yesod that teshuva without vidui is merely self-improvement—changing behavior to avoid consequences or restore self-image. Vidui is "lifnei HaKel Baruch Hu," the mitzvah to restore one's relationship with Hashem, which alone ensures lasting change.
Why does the Rambam locate the essence of teshuvah in vidui (confession) rather than behavioral change? The shiur explores how vidui works even for shogeg (unintentional sin), showing that confession restores relationship with God even when one has pushed Him out of one's world. The connection between vidui and todah (thanks) reveals the deeper meaning of confession.
Why does the Torah use the word "vidui" (confession) to mean both admitting sin and expressing thanks? Vidui only works when we place our wrongdoing in the context of everything Hashem has done for us. True repentance means recognizing His countless favors—making our sins appear not as impositions He placed on us, but as failures to honor One who has given us everything.
Why does the Rambam place free will exclusively in Hilchos Teshuva rather than Yesodei HaTorah? The shiur argues that teshuva begins not with correcting specific sins but with recognizing that free choice grants us ability, not right—we must abandon the arrogance of self-centeredness and reposition Hashem at the universe's center. Only then can we achieve immediate closeness to Him.
Why does the Rambam locate the essence of teshuvah in vidui (confession) rather than behavioral change? The shiur explores how vidui works even for shogeg (unintentional sin), showing that confession restores relationship with God even when one has pushed Him out of one's world. The connection between vidui and todah (thanks) reveals the deeper meaning of confession.
What does kapara really mean—erasing the sin or restoring the sinner? The shiur builds on Rambam Hilchos Teshuvah 1:3 to argue that kapara is not about making sins disappear but about going forward in a relationship with Hashem. The story of Yishmael read on Rosh Hashanah—"ba'asher hu shom"—teaches that the din focuses on who we are now, not on fixing the past.
Why does the Rambam say only teshuvah brings kapara, then add that Yom Kippur itself brings kapara? The shiur develops a fundamental chakira: Yom Kippur features two distinct judgments—one on the yachid's personal aveiros (requiring the mizbeach, now only teshuvah), and one on the tzibbur as a whole (where the sa'ir hamishtale'ach and Yom Kippur itself bring kapara). Each individual stands in both courts.
