A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Rambam (רמב"ם) locate the essence of teshuvah in vidui (confession) rather than behavioral change? The shiur explores how vidui works even for shogeg (unintentional sin), showing that confession restores relationship with God even when one has pushed Him out of one's world. The connection between vidui and todah (thanks) reveals the deeper meaning of confession.
Rabbi Zweig continues his analysis of Hilchos Teshuva (תשובה), focusing on the nature and function of vidui (confession). He begins by emphasizing that according to the Rambam (רמב"ם), the ultimate goal of teshuvah is not merely self-improvement but restoring one's relationship with God. True personal transformation can only be achieved when one genuinely places oneself in God's hands rather than maintaining autonomous control. The Rambam establishes that the mitzvah (מצוה) is not teshuvah per se, but vidui—confession before God. This is learned from the pasuk in Parshas Naso dealing with gezel geirim, where one must confess ("visvadu") after committing a sin. The Rambam distinguishes this from a different pasuk in Bechukosai ("visvadu es avonam ve'avon avosam") used in Hilchos Taanit, raising the question of why different sources are used for what appears to be the same concept.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Hilchos Teshuva 1:1, 2:2
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Mussar
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Rambam frame teshuva around vidui rather than behavioral change? The shiur develops the yesod that teshuva without vidui is merely self-improvement—changing behavior to avoid consequences or restore self-image. Vidui is "lifnei HaKel Baruch Hu," the mitzvah to restore one's relationship with Hashem, which alone ensures lasting change.
Why does the Torah use the word "vidui" (confession) to mean both admitting sin and expressing thanks? Vidui only works when we place our wrongdoing in the context of everything Hashem has done for us. True repentance means recognizing His countless favors—making our sins appear not as impositions He placed on us, but as failures to honor One who has given us everything.
Why does the Rambam require vidui even after paying for damages to a person's body or property? The shiur analyzes Hilchos Teshuva 1:1 and a difficult Kesef Mishneh, arguing that vidui on bodily injury reveals a chiddush: such sins are within the realm of kapara despite monetary payment being inadequate compensation. The distinction between chavalah (bodily harm) and mazik mamon (property damage) drives the Rambam's formulation.
Why does the Rambam place free will exclusively in Hilchos Teshuva rather than Yesodei HaTorah? The shiur argues that teshuva begins not with correcting specific sins but with recognizing that free choice grants us ability, not right—we must abandon the arrogance of self-centeredness and reposition Hashem at the universe's center. Only then can we achieve immediate closeness to Him.
Why is vidui (confession) the central mitzvah in Hilchos Teshuvah, rather than teshuvah itself? The Rambam distinguishes between teshuvah (establishing a prospective relationship with Hashem) and vidui (achieving kapara for the past). Vidui transforms the focus from self-improvement to recognizing Hashem as the "baal davar"—the injured party—and communicating directly to Him, which is what undoes yesterday's aveiros.
What does kapara really mean—erasing the sin or restoring the sinner? The shiur builds on Rambam Hilchos Teshuvah 1:3 to argue that kapara is not about making sins disappear but about going forward in a relationship with Hashem. The story of Yishmael read on Rosh Hashanah—"ba'asher hu shom"—teaches that the din focuses on who we are now, not on fixing the past.
Why does the Rambam say only teshuvah brings kapara, then add that Yom Kippur itself brings kapara? The shiur develops a fundamental chakira: Yom Kippur features two distinct judgments—one on the yachid's personal aveiros (requiring the mizbeach, now only teshuvah), and one on the tzibbur as a whole (where the sa'ir hamishtale'ach and Yom Kippur itself bring kapara). Each individual stands in both courts.
