No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) transition from Sinai's revelation to the detailed laws of Mishpatim? The shiur develops that Sinai represented acceptance through obedience, while Mishpatim introduces a deeper level requiring understanding and internalization. Rashi (רש"י)'s metaphor of a prepared table reveals that mitzvos must be spiritually 'tasted' and internalized, not just mechanically performed, to create genuine dveikut with Hashem (ה׳).
This shiur examines the fundamental difference between two levels of Torah (תורה) acceptance found in Parshat Yisro versus Parshat Mishpatim. In Yisro, the Jewish people received Torah through Moshe Rabbeinu as an intermediary, representing a level of acceptance based on obedience without necessarily understanding. In Mishpatim, there is a direct relationship with Hashem (ה׳) that requires deeper comprehension and internalization. The analysis centers on Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on "V'eileh hamishpatim" where he explains that "v'eileh" (and these) adds to what came before, rather than rejecting it like "eileh" (these) would. The shiur explores why there might be a concern about rejecting the Sinai experience entirely. Rashi's interpretation of "asher tasim lifneihem" reveals that Moshe initially thought he only needed to teach the laws mechanically, like a set table (shulchan aruch), without explaining the reasons (tamei hadavar - literally 'tastes of the matter').
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Aggadita
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How long must Hashem tolerate the Jewish people's rebellious behavior? A Midrash compares this to the halachic question of carrying a child holding muktze on Shabbos. The analysis reveals that rejecting Eretz Yisrael represents a deeper spiritual corruption than individual acts of avoda zara.
Parshat Yisro and Parshat Mishpatim, Rashi on Shemot
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What did Dovid mean when he reduced the 613 mitzvos to twelve principles? The Gemara reveals that mitzvos have two dimensions: fulfilling the obligation and achieving personal completion (hashlomah). Dovid identified twelve core principles that encapsulate the essential character development aspect of all mitzvos.
