A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Can a dried lulav be used in pressing circumstances? The Gemara (גמרא) rules it's kosher b'sha'as hadechak, yet the Raavad protests: pasul means pasul d'Oraisa. The shiur develops the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s yesod that netilas lulav contains two distinct halachic components—a mitzvah (מצוה) requirement and a ritzui (korban-like) requirement—and that sha'as hadechak permits fulfilling the mitzvah component alone.
This shiur analyzes the Gemara (גמרא)'s ruling in Sukkah 29b that lulav hayavesh (a dried lulav) is kosher b'sha'as hadechak (in pressing circumstances), exploring the profound disagreement among Rishonim about the scope and meaning of this halacha (הלכה). The Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Lulav rules that b'sha'as hadechak one may use a dried lulav and even make a bracha on it, but this leniency applies only to lulav itself, not to the other minim. The Raavad objects strenuously: if the Gemara declares lulav hayavesh "pasul," how can there be any distinction between l'chatchilah and b'di'eved? Pasul d'Oraisa means pasul, period. Moreover, where does the Rambam find a basis in the Gemara for distinguishing between lulav and the other species, and why doesn't this leniency extend to other disqualifications? The shiur identifies three major chiddushim in the Rambam's ruling: (1) b'sha'as hadechak lulav hayavesh is kosher and one may make a bracha on it, (2) this applies only to lulav hayavesh and not to the other minim when they are dried, and (3) other disqualifications (like nikdam rosho or nifrat zu) are not kosher even b'sha'as hadechak. The Geonim disagree on the third point, ruling that all disqualifications are kosher b'sha'as hadechak on Yom Tov Rishon, since they are all kosher on Yom Tov Sheini. The Hagaos Maimonios disagrees on the second point, extending the leniency to hadas hayavesh as well.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Sukkah 29b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.
