A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) write "if you lend money" (im kesef talveh) when lending is obligatory? The unusual formulation teaches that the obligation isn't merely to lend—it's to develop genuine care and concern for the borrower. The shiur explores how interpersonal mitzvos must be performed with emotional connection, not just technical compliance, and why brachos are never made on such mitzvos.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a fundamental question on Parshas Mishpatim's laws of lending money. The Torah (תורה) writes "im kesef talveh es ami" (Shemos 21:24)—literally "if you lend money to my people." Rashi (רש"י) explains that although "im" usually means a voluntary "if," this is one of three exceptions where it indicates obligation. But this creates a glaring textual problem: why include the word "im" at all? If the Torah simply wrote "kesef talveh," it would clearly mean "you shall lend money" without any ambiguity. Why choose the most awkward formulation possible, requiring the Oral Law to clarify that "im" here means "you must"? To answer this, Rabbi Zweig analyzes a sugya in Kiddushin 40a regarding categories of tzaddikim and resha'im. The Gemara (גמרא) infers from Yeshaya's phrase "imru tzaddik ki tov" (say to the tzaddik who is good) that there exists both a good tzaddik and a not-good tzaddik. Similarly, from "hoy rasha ra" (woe to the wicked who is evil), we learn of wicked people who are evil and those who are not. The Gemara explains: a good tzaddik keeps laws between man and God plus interpersonal laws; a tzaddik she'eino tov keeps only laws between man and God. A rasha ra violates both categories; a rasha she'eino ra violates laws between man and God but keeps interpersonal laws.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Shemos 22:24 (Parshas Mishpatim)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Torah emphasize Rivka's Aramean ancestry when describing her marriage to Yitzchok? The shiur reveals that Arameans were master manipulators with extraordinary sensitivity to others' psychology. Rivka inherited this keen insight but channeled it into genuine chesed, which requires understanding what recipients actually need rather than what givers want to provide.
Why does the Torah separate Avrohom's eulogy for Sarah from his crying for her? The shiur shows that Sarah required a public eulogy focused on the communal loss of a leader, not Avrohom's private grief. This teaches that we must view Jewish tragedies through a national lens first, seeing attacks on Am Yisrael as collective losses that dwarf personal concerns.
Why does Rashi describe Avrohom and Ephron's land deal as happening "between friends" when they just met? The shiur develops the principle that overpaying transforms business transactions into expressions of friendship and respect. Great people habitually overpay to ensure no one feels exploited, creating "lekach tov" situations where both parties benefit with dignity.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
