A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why would Hashem (ה׳) threaten to kill Moshe's uncircumcised son on the way to Egypt when the child bore no responsibility? The Baal HaTurim's principle that milah is essential for closeness to Hashem reveals that a father's uncircumcised child creates a deficiency in the father's own milah status. Just as an uncircumcised child prevents one from eating Korban Pesach (פסח), it would have prevented Moshe from receiving prophecy—making the mission to redeem Israel impossible.
This shiur addresses a troubling question from the episode where Hashem (ה׳) sought to kill someone ("vayevakesh hamiso") when Moshe was returning to Egypt with an uncircumcised son. A machlokes Tannaim debates whether Hashem intended to kill Moshe or the child. While it makes sense that Moshe could be punished for failing to perform the bris milah, why would the innocent child deserve death? The Baal HaTurim on Parshas Nitzavim provides the key insight. On the pasuk "Ki hamitzvah hazos asher anochi metzavcha hayom lo nifles hi mimcha velo rechokas hi" (this mitzvah (מצוה) is not too distant from you), which Rashi (רש"י) interprets as referring to Torah (תורה), the Baal HaTurim notes that the words "mi ya'aleh lanu hashamayim" (who will go up for us to Heaven) begin with the letters mem, yud, lamed, hei—spelling "milah." From this, the Baal HaTurim derives a fundamental principle: a person who does not have milah cannot achieve closeness to Hashem.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Nitzavim 30:11-14
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why did Potiphar's wife pursue Yosef, and what does Rashi mean when he calls her actions "leshem shamayim"? The shiur argues she correctly saw in astrology that she and Yosef would have a child—an unchangeable decree for most people. But as a descendant of Avrohom, whom Hashem lifted above the stars, Yosef possessed the unique power to bend astrological fate, transforming the prediction into fulfillment through her daughter (Osnas) instead.
Why did Hashem cure all the sick, blind, deaf, and lame before Matan Torah? The Rambam teaches that miracles require purpose. This shiur argues that the mass healing demonstrated that Torah is not meant for the downtrodden seeking comfort, but for healthy people who can fully channel their energies toward mitzvos and serve as proper examples to their communities.
Why does the Aramaic word for "accept" (Kabbalah) also mean "complain"? The shiur develops a profound insight: genuine acceptance only emerges from overcoming resistance. Without internal challenge, an idea merely passes through us—true commitment is born only when we wrestle with, resist, and ultimately decide to embrace a principle.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
