No community start suggestion yet.
If the Jews willingly accepted the Torah (תורה) with Naaseh V'Nishma, why did Hashem (ה׳) still need to coerce them? The Maharal explains that Torah is hechrechi (axiomatic) - the world must exist with Torah, not as a choice. At Purim (פורים), through hester panim, the Jews discovered the choice wasn't between existing with or without Torah, but between existence and non-existence itself.
This shiur examines the paradox of Jewish acceptance of Torah (תורה) at Mount Sinai, beginning with Rashi (רש"י)'s insight that Naaseh V'Nishma was said in response to Moshe reading Sefer HaBris (from Bereishis to Matan Torah) to the people. Rabbi Yeshaya Greenberg ZT"L addresses Tosafos (תוספות)' famous question: if the Jewish people already willingly accepted the Torah with Naaseh V'Nishma, why was divine coercion (kafah aleihem har k'gigis) necessary? Tosafos suggests they might have reconsidered upon seeing the great fire at Mount Sinai, but the Maharal objects that this undermines the merit of their willing acceptance. The Maharal presents a fundamental principle: Torah is hechrechi (axiomatic/necessary) - the world must exist with Torah, not as a matter of choice. Therefore, Hashem (ה׳) could not allow the Jewish people to accept Torah based on willing agreement, as this would imply Torah could exist or not exist based on human decision. The acceptance at Sinai was flawed because the people understood they had a choice between existing with Torah or without it. The shiur then explores the concept of hester panim (hiding of God's face) during the Purim (פורים) story. Unlike the common understanding that we cannot see God, hester panim means God hides His face from us - creating the feeling of complete abandonment. During Purim's hester panim, the Jewish people experienced what it meant to exist without divine presence and discovered they could not survive without God. This revelation transformed their understanding: the choice was never between existing with or without Torah, but between existence and non-existence itself. At Purim, through the principle of nahafoch hu (reversal), the very thing Haman thought would destroy the Jews - their disconnection from God - brought them back to Him. The kimu v'kiblu (they confirmed and accepted) at Purim represents a new type of willing acceptance. Unlike Sinai, where ratzon (will) contradicted hechrechi (necessity), at Purim ratzon and hechrechi aligned. The people now embraced Torah not as a choice between options, but as recognition that no other possibility exists. This willing acceptance was based on understanding that Torah equals existence itself.
Parshas Mishpatim
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How was Yitzchok comforted after Sarah's death through marrying Rivka? The Hebrew 'vayinachem' means both comfort and change of direction, revealing that healing comes through shifting focus outward. Depression and mourning are self-absorbed states; true comfort emerges when we channel our pain into caring for others.
How could Avrohom keep the entire Torah before it was given, including rabbinical laws? The key insight is that mitzvos represent eternal spiritual realities, not just historical commemorations, so Avrohom could access these truths through his genuine search. His entire 172-year journey—even his early idolatry—retroactively became service of God once he reached ultimate truth.
Why does the Gemara say Avrohom knew God from age three while the Rambam says forty, after describing his idolatrous past? The principle that baalei teshuvah transform past sins into merits explains how Avrohom's early struggles became retroactive mitzvos once he used that experience to reach other idol worshippers. Unlike Shem and Ever who lacked such background, Avrohom's difficult past became his greatest qualification for helping others.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
