No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Moshe ask Pharaoh to let the Jews go for only three days when they were never coming back? The shiur reveals that the entire conflict was never about substantive issues but about control—Pharaoh's refusal to submit to God's authority. True freedom from control battles, the shiur argues, comes only through controlling ourselves rather than others.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a fundamental question in Parshas Beshalach: why did Moshe Rabbeinu ask Pharaoh to let the Jewish people go for only three days when they were clearly leaving permanently? The request appears deceptive, especially since God had already told the Jews they were going to inherit the land of their forefathers. Yet Pharaoh genuinely believed it was only a three-day trip, as evidenced by his pursuing them only after three days had passed without their return. The shiur presents three compelling difficulties with the narrative. First, how could Moshe, speaking as God's agent, seemingly mislead Pharaoh about the duration of their departure? Second, from a pure business perspective, Pharaoh's refusal makes no sense—the plagues caused far more lost productivity than a three-day absence would have. Why not simply let them go for three days and avoid the devastating plagues? Third, Moshe acted seemingly irresponsibly by removing each plague before the Jews had left Egypt, repeatedly trusting Pharaoh despite his pattern of reneging on his promises.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Beshalach; Parshas Vaera; Parshas Shemos
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!