A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
If a man says "half of me is marrying you," is the kiddushin valid? The Gemara (גמרא) distinguishes between chatzi ish (half a man) and chatzi isha (half a woman). The shiur develops the Rashba's approach that chatzi isha is invalid because it creates an inferior quality of marriage (meshar bekinyan), while chatzi ish can be valid as a quantitative division—regular marriage affecting only half the man—allowing him to marry someone else.
This in-depth shiur analyzes Kiddushin 7a, exploring the Gemara (גמרא)'s distinction between "chatzi ish" (half a man) and "chatzi isha" (half a woman) in the context of kiddushin. The fundamental question is: what happens when a man attempts to consecrate a woman using language of "half"? The Gemara presents a machlokes between Abaye and Rava. Abaye holds there is a pasuk that teaches "ish v'lo chatzi ish" and "isha v'lo chatzi isha"—the act of kiddushin itself must involve a complete man and complete woman. Rava disagrees, arguing that the pasuk doesn't address the ma'aseh kiddushin (the act of acquisition), but rather the chalos (the resulting legal status)—the end result must be a complete marriage between a full ish and isha.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kiddushin 7a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
