No community start suggestion yet.
What distinguishes divine emes (truth/justice) from chesed (חסד) (kindness), and why are they linked to Yaakov and Avrohom respectively? True chesed involves giving without any expectation of benefit, recognition, or logical return - a godly trait that only those who share divine nature can genuinely achieve. The Sodom mentality represents the opposite: preventing others' benefit even at no personal cost, revealing complete absence of this divine characteristic.
This shiur provides a deep philosophical analysis of two crucial divine attributes mentioned in Micah 7:20: "Grant truth to Yaakov, benevolence to Avrohom." Rabbi Zweig explores the fundamental distinction between emes (truth/justice) and chesed (חסד) (kindness) as both divine qualities and human character traits that we are meant to emulate. The shiur begins by examining how God operates with two distinct modes of conduct. The attribute of emes represents strict justice - dealing with people according to the letter of the law, giving each person exactly what they deserve. Those who conduct themselves only according to strict justice are called "Yaakov," representing the average person who fulfills their basic obligations. In contrast, chesed represents going beyond the letter of the law, as exemplified by Avrohom who showed extraordinary kindness to others.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Micah 7:20, Pirkei Avos 5:10
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Mussar
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Rambam place free will exclusively in Hilchos Teshuva rather than Yesodei HaTorah? The shiur argues that teshuva begins not with correcting specific sins but with recognizing that free choice grants us ability, not right—we must abandon the arrogance of self-centeredness and reposition Hashem at the universe's center. Only then can we achieve immediate closeness to Him.
Why is vidui (confession) the central mitzvah in Hilchos Teshuvah, rather than teshuvah itself? The Rambam distinguishes between teshuvah (establishing a prospective relationship with Hashem) and vidui (achieving kapara for the past). Vidui transforms the focus from self-improvement to recognizing Hashem as the "baal davar"—the injured party—and communicating directly to Him, which is what undoes yesterday's aveiros.
Why does the Rambam locate the essence of teshuvah in vidui (confession) rather than behavioral change? The shiur explores how vidui works even for shogeg (unintentional sin), showing that confession restores relationship with God even when one has pushed Him out of one's world. The connection between vidui and todah (thanks) reveals the deeper meaning of confession.
What does kapara really mean—erasing the sin or restoring the sinner? The shiur builds on Rambam Hilchos Teshuvah 1:3 to argue that kapara is not about making sins disappear but about going forward in a relationship with Hashem. The story of Yishmael read on Rosh Hashanah—"ba'asher hu shom"—teaches that the din focuses on who we are now, not on fixing the past.
