No community start suggestion yet.
Does genuine chesed (חסד) require total altruism with no expectation of return? Rabbi Zweig argues the opposite: chesed is inherently about building a relationship where both parties give and receive. The highest form of chesed—chesed shel emes—is not one-sided but purely focused on the relationship itself, free from ulterior material motives.
Rabbi Zweig begins with Yaakov's request to Yosef in Parshas Vayechi to perform "chesed (חסד) v'emes"—true kindness—by burying him in Israel rather than Egypt. Rashi (רש"י) explains that kindness to the dead is called "chesed sheleimus" (complete kindness) because it is done without expectation of reward. Most people understand this to mean that genuine chesed must be entirely altruistic, with no expectation of anything in return. Rabbi Zweig argues this understanding is fundamentally mistaken and creates unnecessary guilt about our motivations. The shiur presents a fundamental question: If chesed requires total altruism, how can we do chesed for our children, from whom we naturally expect something back? How can we reconcile the Ramchal's teaching that God created the world to give us pleasure with the Mishna's instruction not to serve God for reward? How can Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi's teaching in Pirkei Avos that we should be equally careful with all mitzvos because we don't know their rewards be reconciled with the prohibition against serving for reward?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Vayechi (Bereishis 47:29 - chesed v'emes)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!