A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Can an eishes ish who is forbidden to the yavam through a conditional neder (baalas tenaim) exempt her tzarah from yibum? The shiur analyzes Tosfos Yevamos 6a and 17a, exploring whether zika l'yibum depends on the moment of nefilah or on ongoing status, and unpacking the machlokes Ramban (רמב"ן)-Rashba on whether an ervah must be present at nefilah to exempt the tzarah.
This shiur on Yevamos 6a presents a complex analysis of when a woman is considered an ervah for purposes of exempting her tzarah from yibum, focusing on the case of a baalas tenaim—a woman whose status as eishes ish to the yavam depends on a conditional restriction. Rabbi Zweig begins by distinguishing between two types of exemptions from yibum: (1) when a woman herself is an ervah b'shas nefilah (at the moment the husband dies), making her categorically outside the parsha of yibum, and (2) when zika l'yibum subsequently falls off due to a prohibition that arises later. The first creates a total exemption; the second raises the question whether the zika can "come back" if the impediment is removable. The shiur examines Tosfos on daf 6a and daf 17a, showing an apparent contradiction. On daf 17a (tes zayin), Tosfos holds that when there is initially a zika l'yibum and then the woman becomes forbidden (such as through mekadesh her to create an issur eishes ish), if that prohibition can be removed by giving a get, then the zika never truly goes off—"anything that can come back doesn't go off." But on daf 6a (yud), Tosfos discusses a case where the woman is already an eishes ish to the yavam through a conditional neder at the moment of nefilah, and Tosfos holds she does not exempt the tzarah because "she's not dumi l'achos isha." Rabbi Zweig reconciles these Tosfos by arguing that daf yud is discussing a situation where b'shas nefilah there is no zika at all—she is already an eishes ish—so the question is not whether zika can be restored but whether she ever had zika to begin with.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Yevamos 6a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.