A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Can an eishes ish who is forbidden to the yavam through a conditional neder (baalas tenaim) exempt her tzarah from yibum? The shiur analyzes Tosfos Yevamos 6a and 17a, exploring whether zika l'yibum depends on the moment of nefilah or on ongoing status, and unpacking the machlokes Ramban (רמב"ן)-Rashba on whether an ervah must be present at nefilah to exempt the tzarah.
This shiur on Yevamos 6a presents a complex analysis of when a woman is considered an ervah for purposes of exempting her tzarah from yibum, focusing on the case of a baalas tenaim—a woman whose status as eishes ish to the yavam depends on a conditional restriction. Rabbi Zweig begins by distinguishing between two types of exemptions from yibum: (1) when a woman herself is an ervah b'shas nefilah (at the moment the husband dies), making her categorically outside the parsha of yibum, and (2) when zika l'yibum subsequently falls off due to a prohibition that arises later. The first creates a total exemption; the second raises the question whether the zika can "come back" if the impediment is removable. The shiur examines Tosfos on daf 6a and daf 17a, showing an apparent contradiction. On daf 17a (tes zayin), Tosfos holds that when there is initially a zika l'yibum and then the woman becomes forbidden (such as through mekadesh her to create an issur eishes ish), if that prohibition can be removed by giving a get, then the zika never truly goes off—"anything that can come back doesn't go off." But on daf 6a (yud), Tosfos discusses a case where the woman is already an eishes ish to the yavam through a conditional neder at the moment of nefilah, and Tosfos holds she does not exempt the tzarah because "she's not dumi l'achos isha." Rabbi Zweig reconciles these Tosfos by arguing that daf yud is discussing a situation where b'shas nefilah there is no zika at all—she is already an eishes ish—so the question is not whether zika can be restored but whether she ever had zika to begin with.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Yevamos 6a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.