A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does Shemos 22:21–23 punish the abuser's wife and children when he mistreats orphans and widows? The shiur develops a striking yesod: a person cannot be sensitive to others' vulnerability unless his own family teaches him emotional awareness. Wives must tell husbands how much they mean to them, and children must express love to parents—otherwise the family itself is culpable for the father's insensitivity.
This shiur delivers a profound analysis of Shemos 22:21–23, which prohibits abusing widows and orphans and threatens severe punishment: the abuser will die, and his wife will become a widow unable to remarry (an agunah), while his children become orphans unable to inherit. Rashi (רש"י) explains that the bodies of these men will not be found, preventing remarriage and inheritance. Rabbi Zweig opens with a fundamental question: why are the wife and children punished when they did nothing wrong? The husband receives his punishment through death; the ongoing suffering of the wife and children appears unjust. The shiur develops a revolutionary reading of the pasuk. Rabbi Zweig argues that the Torah (תורה) is not describing a cruel person who actively tortures widows and orphans, but rather an ordinary individual who lacks sensitivity to vulnerable people. The same joke or casual remark that a secure person would brush off can devastate someone who has lost a parent or spouse. The question becomes: why is a person held responsible for not recognizing this heightened sensitivity?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Shemos 22:21-23 (Parshas Mishpatim)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
