No community start suggestion yet.
When the Torah (תורה) says 'if the sun has risen' regarding killing a thief, does the figurative meaning (clear intentions) replace the literal (daytime) or complement it? The machlokes between Rambam (רמב"ם) and Ra'avad establishes whether deeper Torah interpretations work independently of pshat or must always ground themselves in literal meaning.
This shiur explores a fundamental disagreement between two Torah (תורה) giants - Rambam (רמב"ם) (Maimonides) and Ra'avad - regarding the relationship between literal (pshat) and figurative interpretations in Torah text. Rabbi Zweig begins by examining the law of a thief breaking into one's home from Parshas Mishpatim, where the Torah states that if someone finds a thief breaking in, he may kill the intruder without liability. However, 'im zarcha hashemesh' (if the sun has risen on him), then he is liable. Rashi (רש"י) explains this figuratively - if it's clear as daylight that the intruder won't kill you (such as a father stealing from his son), then you cannot kill him. The Ra'avad, however, insists on maintaining the literal meaning alongside the figurative - both that daytime thieves cannot be killed AND that those who clearly won't harm you cannot be killed. This disagreement extends to three major areas. First, regarding the Messianic Age: Rambam sees prophetic descriptions of lions dwelling with lambs as purely figurative representations of peace, while Ra'avad argues that if the Torah states wild animals will be destroyed, this must be literally true alongside its deeper meaning about societal harmony. Second, concerning anthropomorphism: Rambam views all physical descriptions of God as purely figurative, making anyone who believes God has a body a non-believer. Ra'avad argues that while God isn't physical, the Torah's use of terms like 'hand' indicates something in the divine realm that corresponds to our physical hand - not mere metaphor but a non-physical reality that parallels physical concepts.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Hashkafa
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Megillas Esther interrupt Torah study for a message the world deemed ridiculous—that every man should rule his home? The shiur develops the yesod that the moon's willingness to "make itself small" doesn't diminish it but creates unified sovereignty. A woman who enables her husband to lead isn't relegated to second class—she is the king-maker, comfortable creating oneness where a man cannot.
Does going to doctors contradict relying on Hashem as our healer? The Ramban holds medicine is a concession for those not on high spiritual levels, while the Rambam views medicine as a science—a domain Hashem established. The shiur resolves this by explaining that illness uniquely separates a person from Hashem, making self-cure through teshuvah impossible and necessitating medical intervention.
Parshas Mishpatim - Laws of the thief breaking in
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!