No community start suggestion yet.
Why was Yisro most impressed by measure-for-measure justice rather than God's overwhelming miracles? A measured response from an omnipotent being proves the punishment serves the recipient's growth, not the punisher's satisfaction. This teaches us to respond to others' intentions with restraint and wisdom, focusing on what they need to learn rather than venting our hurt.
Rabbi Zweig examines a puzzling aspect of Yisro's conversion story - why, after witnessing tremendous miracles like the splitting of the Red Sea and the Ten Plagues, Yisro declares "Now I know that Hashem (ה׳) is greater than all gods" specifically because of measure-for-measure justice (the Egyptians drowning in water as they had decreed for Jewish children). The Rabbi addresses three fundamental questions: Why was this water-for-water punishment more convincing than God's obvious omnipotence? Why does the Torah (תורה) cross-reference Yaakov cooking for mourners? And how do we understand that God "overlooks" Jewish sins when experience shows He is quite exacting? The answer lies in understanding measured responses. When someone has unlimited power, using a measured response rather than overwhelming force demonstrates that the punishment is not about venting anger, but about teaching a lesson. An omnipotent being who chooses restraint shows that His actions are focused on the recipient's benefit, not His own satisfaction. This makes God qualitatively different from other gods - His relationship with us is entirely for our sake, not His.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Yisro 18:11
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!