No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Rivka love Yaakov but not Esav? The Torah (תורה) uses different verb tenses—"Yitzchok loved Esav" (past) versus "Rivka loves Yaakov" (present)—to reveal a fundamental insight: fathers give unconditional love, while mothers provide ongoing nurturing. Esav's failure to become something worthy made it impossible for Rivka to nurture him, teaching us that changing a struggling child's environment is the parent's responsibility when direct nurturing becomes impossible.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a question that has troubled many commentators on Parshas Toldos: How could Yitzchok and Rivka, two of the Avos, have raised two such different children—Yaakov the tzaddik and Esav the rasha? Many commentators suggest poor parenting, citing the verse that "Yitzchok loved Esav" and "Rivka loved Yaakov," interpreting this as favoritism. Rabbi Zweig strongly rejects this interpretation as unbearably shallow and impossible to accept about the Avos, who surely understood basic parenting principles better than anyone. The shiur begins with a careful reading of the pesukim. The Torah (תורה) states: "Yitzchok loved (past tense) Esav, for he brought him food, and Rivka loves (present tense) Yaakov." This grammatical discrepancy—past tense for the father's love, present tense for the mother's—is the key to understanding the entire dynamic. Rabbi Zweig explains that this reflects a fundamental difference between paternal and maternal love, based on a Gemara (גמרא) that states: "It is known to He who created the universe that a son's natural closeness is to his mother, and his natural awe is toward his father." The Gemara explains this is because a father sets standards, teaches Torah, and disciplines—creating a relationship of awe—while a mother nurtures through communication and emotional support.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Toldos, Bereishis 25:28
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!