A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) begin Mishpatim with the laws of eved ivri before establishing that a thief must make restitution? The parasha addresses not compensation but rehabilitation: the ganav exhibits eved-like behavior—avoiding responsibility. Selling him as an eved forces immediate responsibility, teaching him accountability through the experience of paying off his debt upfront rather than over time.
Rabbi Zweig opens with Rashi (רש"י)'s statement that the opening vav of "v'ele ha-mishpatim" connects Mishpatim to Sinai, teaching that these laws too are "min Sinai." He questions what this means beyond the obvious—everything in Torah (תורה) is from Hashem (ה׳). He suggests that Sinai refers not just to divine origin but to the event itself, with its unique supernatural phenomena. The placement of Mishpatim sandwiched between two accounts of Maamad Har Sinai (beginning of Yisro and end of Mishpatim) suggests these laws were part of that dramatic Sinaitic event, not merely later transmissions in the Ohel Moed. The shiur then turns to the opening law: "Ki sikneh eved ivri." Rashi debates whether "eved ivri" means a Jewish slave or the slave of a Jew. Rabbi Zweig asks a compelling question: why does the Torah include the word "eved" at all? If it simply said "ki sikneh ivri," the meaning would be unambiguous—you're buying a Jew. The addition of "eved" creates the very ambiguity Rashi must resolve. Furthermore, the pasuk calls him an "eved ivri" before the purchase, but you don't buy an eved ivri—you buy a person who then becomes an eved ivri through the transaction.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Mishpatim, Shemos 21:2
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
