No community start suggestion yet.
What makes kinui v'stira sufficient to prohibit a woman to her husband while pesach (פסח) pasuach (his testimony) is not? The shiur analyzes the fundamental machloket between Rashi (רש"י) and Tosafot on whether eid kiyum is required for isurei nashim. Rashi holds that isur la'baal requires explicit warning (kinui), while Tosafot maintains you need formal eidim like in kiddushin.
This shiur provides an in-depth analysis of a complex sugya in Kesubos 9a dealing with the halachic requirements for prohibiting a married woman to her husband after adultery. The central question revolves around understanding why kinui v'stira (warning and seclusion followed by testimony) can render a woman forbidden to her husband, while pesach (פסח) pasuach (the husband's own testimony that he saw her commit adultery) cannot. The Gemara (גמרא) presents a fundamental kasha: if we say that pesach pasuach is not believed because even if the husband saw eidim witnessing his wife's adultery she wouldn't be forbidden to him, then what case of kinui v'stira would actually prohibit her? This leads to a deeper analysis of what constitutes sufficient testimony in matters of isurei nashim.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 9a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!