A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why did the angels say "we are destroying" when only one angel destroys? The shiur distinguishes two separate destructions of Sodom: the hashchasa (fire and sulfur from Heaven by Hashem (ה׳) Himself at dawn) and the hafeicha (the overturning of the bedrock by the angel Gavriel at sunrise). The angels acted as members of Hashem's beis din for the hashchasa but Gavriel alone was entrusted with the hafeicha—which is why "ki lo uchal" is singular and why he could negotiate with Lot about sparing Tzoar.
The shiur opens with a fundamental question from Rashi (רש"י): three angels came to Avrohom—one to heal him, one to inform Sarah about Yitzchok's birth, and one to destroy Sodom. But why did the third angel need to visit Avrohom at all? The angel's mission was Sodom, not Avrohom's tent. Rashi states the principle that one angel cannot perform two missions ("ein malach echad oseh shtei shlichos"), and inversely, two angels are not sent for one task. Yet the pesukim seem to contradict this: "vayechaziku ha'anashim b'yado"—the angels held his hand (plural)—and later "mashchisim anachnu" (we are destroying), yet finally "ki lo uchal" (I cannot do) is singular. Rashi explains that the angels were punished for arrogance in saying "mashchisim anachnu" and had to admit "ki lo uchal." But the shiur presses further: how could both angels say "we are destroying" when only one was assigned that task? One angel was lying—impossible for a malach. The resolution lies in recognizing that there were two distinct destructions of Sodom. The first was the hashchasa: Hashem (ה׳) rained down fire and sulfur ("Hashem himtir al Sodom v'Amora gofris v'eish me'eis Hashem min hashamayim"). This was an act of Hashem Himself, Hashem Hu u'Beis Dino—Hashem and His court, which includes the angels as members of the beis din. Rashi teaches that whenever the name Hashem appears, it means Hu u'Beis Dino. The angels were sent down as investigating members of the court to see whether Sodom deserved destruction ("erida na v'er'eh"). In this capacity, both angels were principals—members of the beis din—and therefore both could truthfully say "mashchisim anachnu." They were both involved in the judicial process that led to the hashchasa. The hashchasa occurred at alos hashachar (dawn), as Rashi states explicitly.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Vayeira 18:1–19:38
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
How can sinas chinam lead someone to harm himself even more than his enemy? The shiur develops that sinas chinam requires self-hatred first — only someone alienated from himself will damage himself to hurt others. The Bar Kamtsa host and R. Zecharya ben Avkulas both exhibited this self-alienation, showing that proper anava restores love of both self and others.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
