No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Pharaoh sentence the Sar Hamashkim and Sar Ha'ofeh for offenses not committed at the royal table? The shiur analyzes the Midrash's two explanations—a fly and a stone, or an attempted poisoning to marry the king's daughter—and develops the principle that Pharaoh held himself not merely as king but as a deity. This makes even private offenses against his person a capital crime, creating a scandal potent enough to shift attention from Yosef.
This shiur examines the Gemara (גמרא) in Pesachim (page 3, daf 28b) discussing the offenses of the Sar Hamashkim (cupbearer) and the Sar Ha'ofeh (baker) that led to their imprisonment alongside Yosef. The Gemara presents two interpretations: Rabbanan says a fly was found in the cupbearer's drink and a stone in the baker's bread, while Rav Yosef says both attempted to seduce or marry Pharaoh's daughter. Rabbi Zweig opens by questioning both interpretations. According to the first view, why did the baker die and the cupbearer live? Rashi (רש"י) explains that a fly could enter on its own, but a stone indicates negligence in cleaning or sifting. However, according to the second view that both sought the king's daughter, why the different verdicts? Furthermore, the Matnos Kehunah notes that the drink was specifically a post-bathhouse beverage (pailu), not the royal wine served at state functions—why this unusual detail?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Pesachim 28b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
