A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Is nekama (revenge) a character deficiency or the highest form of justice? The shiur develops that revenge, when commanded by Hashem (ה׳), is actually the ultimate justice—what victims need to be restored and elevated after being wronged. Milchemes Midyan was not war but din, which is why Shevet Levi participated.
This shiur addresses the challenging concept of nekama (revenge) in Parshas Matos, specifically examining Hashem (ה׳)'s command to 'take revenge upon the Midyanites.' Rabbi Zweig begins by questioning how revenge, generally considered a character deficiency, can be commanded by Hashem and praised in verses describing Him as 'Kel nekamos Hashem.' The core thesis emerges: revenge is actually the highest form of justice, not a character flaw. Using the principle of 'ayin tachas ayin' (eye for an eye), Rabbi Zweig explains that when someone harms another person—taking out an eye, for instance—money alone cannot restore the victim's sense of wholeness. The victim remains 'down' while the perpetrator remains whole despite paying compensation. True justice requires that the perpetrator suffer the same loss, which delivers the message that the harm was taken seriously and restores the victim's dignity. This is nekama in its pure form—what the victim needs to stand up again.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Matos 31:2-3
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
How can sinas chinam lead someone to harm himself even more than his enemy? The shiur develops that sinas chinam requires self-hatred first — only someone alienated from himself will damage himself to hurt others. The Bar Kamtsa host and R. Zecharya ben Avkulas both exhibited this self-alienation, showing that proper anava restores love of both self and others.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
