No community start suggestion yet.
Is nekama (revenge) a character deficiency or the highest form of justice? The shiur develops that revenge, when commanded by Hashem (ה׳), is actually the ultimate justice—what victims need to be restored and elevated after being wronged. Milchemes Midyan was not war but din, which is why Shevet Levi participated.
This shiur addresses the challenging concept of nekama (revenge) in Parshas Matos, specifically examining Hashem (ה׳)'s command to 'take revenge upon the Midyanites.' Rabbi Zweig begins by questioning how revenge, generally considered a character deficiency, can be commanded by Hashem and praised in verses describing Him as 'Kel nekamos Hashem.' The core thesis emerges: revenge is actually the highest form of justice, not a character flaw. Using the principle of 'ayin tachas ayin' (eye for an eye), Rabbi Zweig explains that when someone harms another person—taking out an eye, for instance—money alone cannot restore the victim's sense of wholeness. The victim remains 'down' while the perpetrator remains whole despite paying compensation. True justice requires that the perpetrator suffer the same loss, which delivers the message that the harm was taken seriously and restores the victim's dignity. This is nekama in its pure form—what the victim needs to stand up again.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Parshas Matos 31:2-3
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
