No community start suggestion yet.
Why did God permit Noach to eat meat after the flood but forbid Adam from doing so? The Gemara (גמרא) reveals a fundamental principle: one may only use what one has contributed to bringing into existence. Since Adam found animals already created, he had no right to take their lives, but Noach saved the animals from total destruction and thereby earned ownership over them.
This shiur explores a fundamental principle governing man's relationship with creation through the lens of why Adam HaRishon was forbidden to eat meat while Noach was permitted to do so after the flood. The discussion begins by examining an apparent contradiction in the Torah (תורה)'s account of creation. On the third day, the Torah states that vegetation sprouted from the earth, but later it says that nothing had yet grown because there was no rain and no man to work the land. The Gemara (גמרא) in Chulin 60b resolves this by explaining that on the third day, plants only emerged to just below ground level and remained there until Adam prayed for rain, which then allowed them to fully sprout. This teaches that Adam actually contributed to bringing vegetation into existence through his prayers and labor. The shiur then applies this principle to the question of eating meat. While Adam contributed to the growth of vegetation through his prayers and agricultural work, he played no role in creating the animals, which were formed on the fifth and sixth days of creation before he could contribute to their existence. Since Adam found the animals already fully formed, he had no right to take their lives for food. The underlying principle is that one may only use what one has contributed to bringing into being - this is how man earns his sustenance and maintains his independence.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does Rashi give conflicting descriptions of Israel's leaders in Egypt? The shiur explores how two different leadership styles emerged: those who pushed people to work harder while taking beatings, versus those who simply absorbed punishment to spare their people. The Torah prioritizes the first type - leaders who accomplish things even when unpopular.
Why is arranging marriages, hiring teachers, and organizing charity permitted on Shabbos—even though mundane speech is forbidden? The Gemara in Masechta Shabbos brings ten examples to prove that these activities aren't merely overriding Shabbos restrictions—they are themselves Shabbos conversations. The shiur develops the fundamental insight that shalom (harmony) is the essence of Shabbos, and any discussion promoting communal unity, family peace, or care for others is a fulfillment of Shabbos, not a compromise.
Why does hiddur mitzvah—beautifying the mitzvos—appear alongside emulating Hashem in the same pasuk (Zeh Keli v'anveihu)? Drawing from Mesilas Yesharim, the shiur explains that beautifying mitzvos creates yirah and awe, not love. Awe allows us to become batel to Hashem's identity, and through that hisbatlus—not mere imitation—we absorb His midos and truly become like Him.
Chulin 60b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why didn't Noach daven for his generation while Avrohom advocated for Sedom? Noach viewed each person as an independent island responsible only for their own teshuvah. Avrohom understood that all humanity is interconnected through shared perspective and values, making prayer for others both possible and necessary.