No community start suggestion yet.
Why did the Jews stop performing bris milah after Yosef's death while the other brothers still lived? The shiur argues that when Yaakov died, the Jews became Egyptian slaves—a legal status that exempted them from mitzvos, leaving them obligated only in the seven Noahide laws. The enslavement deepened when the generation lost its vision of geulah, transforming from "immortals" (kochavim) to mere "mortals" subject to Pharaoh's decrees.
Rabbi Zweig addresses a series of perplexing questions about the chronology and nature of the Egyptian slavery. The Midrash states that when Yosef died, the Jews stopped performing bris milah, yet all the other brothers were still alive. How could an entire generation abandon this fundamental mitzvah (מצוה) under the leadership of the Shivtei Kah? Additionally, there are contradictory statements about when the slavery began: one Rashi (רש"י) says it started with Yaakov's death (Parashas Vayechi), another says with Levi's death (Parashas Vaera), yet the pesukim in Shemos suggest it began only after all the brothers died and the nation multiplied greatly. The shiur's central thesis is that slavery in Egypt was fundamentally a legal relationship, not initially a practical one. When Yaakov died, the Jews were granted Egyptian citizenship. However, Egyptian citizenship meant legal ownership by Pharaoh—the entire Egyptian population had sold themselves and their land to Pharaoh during the famine years, as detailed at the end of Parashas Vayigash. This legal slavery status had profound halachic implications: a Jewish slave owned by a non-Jew loses his status as a Jew and becomes subject only to the seven Noahide laws, not the 613 mitzvos. The proof for this is found in Parashas Behar, where the Torah (תורה) explicitly prohibits a Jewish slave of a non-Jew from engaging in avodah zarah, giluy arayos, and desecrating Shabbos (שבת)—prohibitions that would be unnecessary unless the slave's legal status actually permitted such behavior under the laws governing his master.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Shemos (Exodus) - Opening chapters detailing the enslavement
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.