No community start suggestion yet.
When does placing objects on water constitute proper hanacha on Shabbos (שבת)? The shiur analyzes the Gemara (גמרא)'s cases (water on water, nuts on water, oil on wine) through the lens of whether hanacha requires both stability and ground connection. The Rambam (רמב"ם)'s distinction between hanacha and akira cases reveals that hanacha needs only immediate stability, while akira requires both elements.
This shiur provides a detailed analysis of Gemara (גמרא) Shabbos (שבת) 5b, focusing on the fundamental question of when placing objects on water constitutes a proper act of hanacha (placing) or akira (lifting) that would render one liable for violating Shabbos. Rabbi Zweig begins by examining Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on the phrase 'mayim agav mayim' (water upon water), exploring whether this refers to the top waters or bottom waters being in motion (nayid). The discussion reveals that according to Rashi, the problem is that the waters are in motion, making it unclear whether this constitutes proper placement. The Gemara's progression through various cases is analyzed: mayim agav mayim (water on water), egos agav mayim (nuts on water), and shemen agav yayin (oil on wine). Rabbi Zweig explains that the fundamental issue is determining what constitutes proper hanacha - whether the object must be stationary in relation to what it's placed upon, and whether it must also be connected to the ground (karka). According to the analysis, mayim agav mayim has both elements present (it becomes one unified substance and rests on the ground), while egos agav mayim has neither element.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How can Shabbos observance atone for the idolatry of Enosh's generation? The Rambam's reading shows that generation sought God through physical intermediaries rather than direct connection. Proper Shabbos observance creates authentic divine experience that naturally displaces attraction to spiritual substitutes - like tasting real coffee exposes ersatz as meaningless.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Shabbos 5b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Gemara say one Shabbos protects from Amalek while two Shabboses bring redemption? The shiur applies a principle from Kiddushin about repetition changing psychology: the first time doing anything is experimental, but the second demonstrates genuine desire. True Shabbos connection with Hashem requires moving beyond spiritual curiosity to authentic internalization.
