No community start suggestion yet.
When two people perform an action together on Shabbos (שבת), are both liable or only one? The shiur distinguishes two separate Gemara (גמרא) frameworks: liability based on creating a result (only one liable) versus liability for performing melacha itself (both liable). This chakira resolves the machlokes between Tosafos (תוספות) and Rambam (רמב"ם) and explains parallel cases in damages law.
This shiur explores a profound machlokes between Tosafos (תוספות) and Rambam (רמב"ם) regarding the fundamental nature of liability when two people perform actions together on Shabbos (שבת). Rabbi Zweig presents a novel approach that there are actually two distinct sugyas in the Gemara (גמרא) dealing with different types of liability. The first sugya (daf gimel) deals with liability based on creating a result (totza'ah) - specifically chilul Shabbos. According to this framework, only one person can be liable because there is only one result created. The second sugya (daf 93) introduces a different principle - that there is inherent liability for performing melacha on Shabbos, regardless of the result achieved. Under this framework, both people can be liable because each person is performing an action. Tosafos understands that these represent two different legal principles that can operate independently. The Rambam, however, rules that in cases of true partnership (shutfus), both parties are liable because each assists the other in performing the complete melacha. Rabbi Zweig extends this analysis to resolve apparent contradictions in other areas of halacha (הלכה), particularly regarding kofer (damages for killing with an ox). He explains that initially the Gemara assumed kofer was payment for the loss of a soul (ibud neshamah), which would mean only one person could be liable. However, the Gemara's conclusion is that kofer is payment for negligence in guarding the ox, which allows multiple people to be liable. This principle explains why the Rambam can rule that multiple people pay kofer while maintaining that only one person is liable when the liability is truly based on a single result. The shiur also addresses Rashi (רש"י)'s approach to the requirement of l'chalaik (separate liability for each melacha), explaining that there are two distinct types of prohibitions on Shabbos: the prohibition against performing melacha (which applies to each individual action) and the prohibition against desecrating Shabbos (which may require a more comprehensive violation).
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
How can Shabbos observance atone for the idolatry of Enosh's generation? The Rambam's reading shows that generation sought God through physical intermediaries rather than direct connection. Proper Shabbos observance creates authentic divine experience that naturally displaces attraction to spiritual substitutes - like tasting real coffee exposes ersatz as meaningless.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Shabbos 3a, 93b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Why does the Gemara say one Shabbos protects from Amalek while two Shabboses bring redemption? The shiur applies a principle from Kiddushin about repetition changing psychology: the first time doing anything is experimental, but the second demonstrates genuine desire. True Shabbos connection with Hashem requires moving beyond spiritual curiosity to authentic internalization.
