A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why can one recite a blessing when seeing someone else's Chanukah (חנוכה) candles - a halacha (הלכה) that exists for no other mitzvah (מצוה)? This unique law embodies the Torah (תורה)'s rejection of Greek competitive philosophy, where another's success diminishes one's own. The blessing teaches 'ayin tovah' - genuine joy in others' mitzvah performance rather than begrudging their achievements.
The shiur explores a distinctive halacha (הלכה) of Chanukah (חנוכה): when walking in the street and seeing someone's Chanukah candles, one may recite a blessing - a law that exists for no other mitzvah (מצוה). This unique ruling carries profound philosophical significance about the fundamental difference between Torah (תורה) and Greek worldviews. Greek philosophy, as exemplified by the Olympics and modern Western civilization, is driven by competition - measuring oneself against others, where another's success reflects one's own inadequacy. This competitive mindset inevitably leads to begrudging others' achievements and feeling 'beaten' when others outperform us. Torah philosophy operates on completely different principles: a person competes only against themselves, never against others. The goal is self-improvement rather than comparative achievement. The Chanukah blessing embodies this anti-competitive Torah message. When seeing another's candles on the first night, one recites both 'She'asah nisim laavosainu' and 'Shehecheyanu' - celebrating not just the historical miracle, but expressing gratitude for witnessing someone else perform a mitzvah. According to the Rambam (רמב"ם)'s view, this blessing applies even if one has already fulfilled the mitzvah at home, demonstrating pure joy in another's religious accomplishment without personal benefit. The Rabbis specifically instituted this unique blessing for Chanukah - commemorating the victory over Greek culture - to teach the Jewish value of 'ayin tovah' (good eye), rejoicing in others' successes. This represents the quintessential Jewish message: finding joy in others' achievements rather than viewing them as threats to one's own status. The timing of this law's institution during Chanukah is particularly meaningful, as it directly counters the Greek competitive philosophy that the Maccabees defeated, establishing instead the Torah ideal of celebrating communal rather than individual triumph.
Hilchos Hanukkah - laws of seeing others' candles (ro'eh)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Holidays
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why don't the last eight verses of the Torah require a minyan to read? The shiur develops a fundamental chiddush in the Rambam: Simchas Torah has two distinct takanos of Kriat HaTorah — Zot HaBracha is read from the din of Yom Tov (inyan hayom), while VaYom Moshe is read from the din of Shabbos (siyum haTorah). This explains why a new minyan is required for the last eight verses, and why the Raavad's minhag of having the oleh read (not the baal koreh) signals that the final aliyah is purely Talmud Torah, not shemiat dvar Hashem.
May a man who has already fulfilled his shofar obligation blow shofar for a woman on Rosh Hashanah? The Baal Itur forbids it while Rav Yehuda permits it. The shiur develops that the core dispute is not about violating shvus for another's benefit, but whether a man's blowing creates a "tekiah shel mitzvah" that enables the woman to be yotzei.
When must one interrupt eating or other activities to perform a mitzvah? The Gemara distinguishes between yesh shos (time remains) and ein shos (no time left), and between d'Oraisa and d'Rabbanan obligations. The Rambam's view—that one need not interrupt unless the mitzvah cannot be done later—contrasts sharply with the Rosh and Ran, who hold that mitzvah bo'liyos al tachmitzena requires immediate action even when time remains.
Does answering "amen" add anything when one is already yotzei through shomeia k'oneh? The shiur examines the Rambam's presentation in Hilchos Brachos perek 1, halachos 10-12, questioning why the Rambam states that one who answers amen is "k'mevorach" when earlier he ruled one is yotzei even without answering amen. The shiur explores whether amen provides an additional ma'alah beyond basic yotzei status and analyzes several seemingly contradictory Rambam passages.
