No community start suggestion yet.
When can a woman be believed to say she was unfaithful to a kosher man rather than a pasul one? The shiur analyzes the fundamental dispute between Rabbi Yehoshua and Rabban Gamaliel about testimony in cases where adultery is suspected, exploring the roles of rov (majority), chazakah (presumptive status), and miggo (credibility enhancement).
This shiur provides a detailed analysis of a complex sugya in Kesubos 13a dealing with the testimony of women suspected of adultery. The discussion centers on two main cases: a pregnant woman (muberes) and a woman who speaks as if she had relations (medaberes), and how their testimony is evaluated when they claim to have been unfaithful to a kosher man rather than a pasul one. Rabbi Zweig begins by examining the dispute between Rabbi Yehoshua and Rabban Gamaliel. Rabbi Yehoshua argues that just as by shevuyah (a captive woman), where there are witnesses that she was violated and the majority of captors are gentiles (who would render her unfit for kehunah), she is not believed to say she wasn't violated, so too in our cases she shouldn't be believed. Rabban Gamaliel responds by distinguishing between cases: by shevuyah there are witnesses she was violated (yesh eidim), while in our case there are no such witnesses (ein eidim).
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 13a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
