A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
How can angels have free will if they're pure intelligence with perfect knowledge of God? The Gemara (גמרא) Gittin 7b explores the paradox: angels sin when clothed in physical bodies, because body and intellect war in them—whereas by humans, body and sechel can unify. Naaseh v'nishma means achieving the angel's unified state where mitzvos become our total being.
Rabbi Zweig opens with a perplexing Gemara (גמרא) in Gittin 7b about angels protesting when Hashem (ה׳) removed the crowns from the Jewish people after the sin of the Golden Calf. The angels asked: "Why are you taking away their crowns?" This raises fundamental questions about the nature of angels and their relationship to sin and free will. The Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Yesodei HaTorah describes three categories of creation: physical matter with form (humans, animals, minerals), celestial bodies with unchanging form, and pure spiritual beings with no physicality whatsoever—the angels. Angels are pure intelligence, separated from each other not by physical space but by levels of spiritual reality. The Rambam lists ten levels of angels from Chayos (highest) down to Ishim (lowest), and states that even the lowest angel's awareness is beyond what the highest human being clothed in physical matter can achieve.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Gittin 7b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
