No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the Torah (תורה) omit the word "shepherd" repeatedly in Yaakov's encounter at the well? The shiur develops the principle that parnassah is a gift from Hashem (ה׳), not an entitlement. Lavan's entire approach—feeling entitled rather than grateful—underlies his capacity for deception and exploitation, teaching us that true simcha b'chelko only comes when we recognize everything as matnas Elokim.
Rabbi Zweig delivers a profound analysis of Parshas Vayeitzei, focusing on the seemingly strange narrative of Yaakov's encounter at the well in Paddan-Aram. The shiur opens with the fundamental question: who exactly was Lavan? He appears to be a gangster-like figure, yet he produced Rochel and Leah, recognized Eliezer as "baruch Hashem (ה׳)," and clearly possessed tremendous spiritual insight. The Midrash finds deep significance in this passage, noting that the word "be'er" (well) appears seven times, corresponding to the seven aliyos on Shabbos (שבת), while "pi habe'er" appears five times for the weekday aliyos, and "al pi habe'er" three times for daily readings. The core textual difficulty lies in the Torah (תורה)'s peculiar language. Throughout the passage, the Torah consistently omits the word "shepherd." The verses describe flocks being watered, stones being rolled away, and sheep returning—but never mentions who is doing these actions. When the text should say "shepherds water the flocks," it says only "the flocks are watered." When it should say "the shepherds will roll the stone," it says "the flocks will roll the stone." This grammatical anomaly appears repeatedly, creating an almost incomprehensible narrative. Furthermore, when Rochel finally arrives with her father's sheep, the Torah explicitly states "ki ro'ah hi"—"because she was a shepherdess"—which seems entirely superfluous since anyone arriving with sheep is obviously a shepherd.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
Why does the Midrash connect Pharaoh's expulsion of the Jews to the mitzvah of shiluach hakan? The shiur develops a chiddush that Pharaoh's sin wasn't only drowning the children, but the insensitivity of expelling the parents afterward. The deeper analysis reveals that Pharaoh may have valued the Jews greatly and wanted to control them—making his expulsion an act of tremendous cruelty, not liberation.
Why does Moshe respond to the splitting of the sea with shirah rather than praise or thanksgiving? Rashi's use of "al libo" reveals that shirah is an emotional expression—a response of love to love. When Hashem shows personal care, the only adequate response is "I love You too," not mere gratitude or praise, and this principle applies to all relationships.
Bereishis 29:1-10 (Parshas Vayeitzei)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
