A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why does the parsha of Eglah Arufah obligate a community to escort strangers, and what does it teach about Bris Bein HaBesarim? The shiur develops a fundamental yesod that the 400 years of displacement in Egypt was meant to give Klal Yisrael an unbreakable connection to Eretz Yisrael—only one who lacks a "place" for generations can fully appreciate having one. The communal obligation to give travelers a sense of place reflects the core lesson of Yetzias Mitzrayim.
Rabbi Zweig opens with Rashi (רש"י)'s perplexing comment on Parshas Vayigash. When Yehuda explains to Yosef that Binyamin cannot leave his father, Rashi states that they feared Binyamin would die on the road because his mother, Rochel, died on the road—as though death on the road were a hereditary condition. This seems absurd, and moreover, the entire context suggests the problem is the emotional bond between father and son, not a genetic vulnerability. Similarly, later in the parsha, when Yaakov sees the wagons (agalos) that Yosef sent, Rashi explains these reminded Yaakov of the last Torah (תורה) topic they studied together—Eglah Arufah. Yet agalos means wagons, and eglah means calf; how can Chazal derive a connection from a linguistic play? Furthermore, Pharaoh sent the wagons, so how can they serve as a sign from Yosef? The Rambam (רמב"ם) in Hilchos Avel presents the halachos of accompanying guests (levaya) and cites two distinct sources. First, he describes the tradition from Avrohom Avinu that hachnasas orchim, hospitality, reaches its pinnacle in levaya—escorting the guest out. The Rambam states that failure to escort is tantamount to murder. Then the Rambam brings the Torah source from Eglah Arufah: when a murdered person is found between cities, the elders of the nearest city declare "yadeinu lo shafchu es ha'dam ha'zeh"—our hands did not spill this blood—which implies that had they not escorted the traveler, they would be guilty of murder. The Rambam further rules that beis din must compel the community to provide escort services for travelers (over mimakom l'makom), and neglecting this makes the beis din itself guilty of murder. The question is glaring: if there is an explicit pasuk teaching the obligation and consequence of levaya, why does the Rambam first cite Avrohom Avinu's tradition? What does Avrohom's conduct add to the halacha (הלכה) derived from Eglah Arufah?
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Parshas Vayigash (Bereishis 44:18-47:27); Parshas Lech Lecha (Bris Bein HaBesarim, Bereishis 15); Parshas Ki Seitzei (Eglah Arufah, Devarim 21:1-9)
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Parsha
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Up Next in this Series
Why does seeing a sotah inspire one to become a nazir? The nazir's abstention creates a pre-sin state where body and soul exist in perfect harmony. This 30-day period corrects the internal contradiction that led to his original transgression.
What is the primary purpose of the cities of refuge - protecting the accidental killer or something else? The shiur argues that creating respect for law takes precedence over providing sanctuary. True deterrence comes from recognizing the gravity of murder itself, not fear of punishment.
How can sinas chinam lead someone to harm himself even more than his enemy? The shiur develops that sinas chinam requires self-hatred first — only someone alienated from himself will damage himself to hurt others. The Bar Kamtsa host and R. Zecharya ben Avkulas both exhibited this self-alienation, showing that proper anava restores love of both self and others.
Why did the brothers hate Yosef when he received the kutonet pasim, yet strangers saw him as special? The kutonet represented Yaakov's recognition of Yosef's leadership ability—his power to uplift and unify. The brothers' jealousy blinded them; the Torah omits his name when they see him (just "oto"), but strangers always saw "Yosef." True chein comes from seeing others clearly, without the bias of our own needs.
Why did the materials for the Mishkan equal exactly what was needed with no waste, despite the principle that blessing doesn't rest on counted items? The shiur explains that Moshe's complete faithfulness—working solely for Hashem's agenda—transformed counting from an act of personal ownership into one that strengthened divine connection, thereby increasing blessings. Korach's self-interest inverted this principle, costing him everything.
Why does Rashi describe the Mishkan as "collateral" for Jewish sins? Rabbi Zweig develops the concept that God limited His own collection rights—accepting only the Mishkan's destruction rather than the nation's annihilation. This reflects the relationship of a father who reduces his own claims to ensure his children's survival.
Why does the Torah give a detailed accounting of silver and copper but not gold in Parshas Pekudei? The three metals represent three types of givers: those who give selflessly (gold), those seeking a two-way benefit (silver), and those buying honor (copper). The Midrash's three groups suspecting or praising Moshe reveal more about themselves than about Moshe—we judge others by our own standards.
