No community start suggestion yet.
What does Rashi (רש"י) mean when he says "אין לו אב" (he has no father) regarding converting a minor? The shiur develops that if there were a father, conversion couldn't happen due to ownership issues, not because zechiyah wouldn't apply. This reading resolves apparent contradictions in the Gemara (גמרא)'s flow.
The shiur begins with a detailed analysis of Rashi (רש"י)'s commentary on the principle of זכין לאדם שלא בפניו as applied to converting minors. Rabbi Zweig examines two aspects of Rashi's explanation: first, that we can only convert a child when "אין לו אב" (he has no father), and second, that "דאימו הביאו ליזגייר" (his mother brought him to be converted). The central difficulty is understanding why, if having a father would eliminate the need for zechiyah entirely, the Gemara (גמרא) doesn't simply answer the Mishna's case by saying the father was present. The shiur explores several possible interpretations. Initially considering that Rashi might mean conversion without zechiyah is possible when there's a father, Rabbi Zweig demonstrates this creates insurmountable problems with the Gemara's structure, particularly regarding היגדיל יכול למחות (when he matures, he can protest). If no zechiyah were needed with a father present, the entire discussion of למחות would be irrelevant.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 11a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
