A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Rav Rehumi die when he merely came home late from his studies? The shiur develops a yesod that marital obligations grow proportionally with each spouse's investment and sacrifice. True shalom bayis requires reaching for tomorrow's deeper connection today, creating holiness through selflessness rather than ritual alone.
This shiur presents a profound analysis of shalom bayis (peace in the home) through the lens of Talmudic stories and halachic principles. Rabbi Zweig begins with the troubling story of Rav Rehumi from Kesubos 62b, who died when he came home late after being away studying for a year, causing his wife distress. Rather than viewing this as an impossibly harsh standard, Rabbi Zweig explains that the level of obligation between spouses corresponds to their level of mutual devotion and sacrifice. The shiur develops this theme through the story of Rabbi Akiva and his wife, where her extraordinary sacrifice (selling her hair so he could study) created a correspondingly high level of obligation for him to show appreciation and reciprocate. This illustrates that love and marital obligations are not static but grow proportionally with the investment each spouse makes in the relationship.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kesubos 62b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does the Gemara present a kal v'chomer for chuppah making kiddushin based on kesef not being maichel b'terumah, only to reject it? The shiur reveals that even the rejected kal v'chomer establishes a fundamental yesod: kiddushin is a kinyan for ishus (marital relationship), not merely a kinyan in hilchos kinyanim. The second kal v'chomer—from chuppah being gomeres—raises Tosafos's famous question.
Is the kesef used in kiddushin a true kinyan (acquisition), or merely a symbolic means of establishing marriage? The shiur analyzes multiple interpretations of the Gemara's derivation from ki yikach ki'ach mi'Sayeffron, exploring whether marriage constitutes ownership, and develops three fundamental approaches: (1) The Gemara proves ishus is a kinyan, (2) ishus is not a kinyan but uses kinyan-like means, or (3) ishus is a kinyan but the kesef may not be a ma'aseh kinyan. The Rambam's position—calling kesef "midivrei sofrim"—is explained as distinguishing between cross-referencing concepts versus borrowing terminology.
Why does the Mishna alternate between the language of "kinyan" (acquisition) and "kiddushin" (sanctification) when describing marriage? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction: marriage has two separate aspects—a kinyan dimension (ownership) and a kedusha dimension (sanctified relationship). Either aspect can initiate the bond, and understanding this dual nature resolves multiple textual and halachic questions throughout the sugya.
Does kiddushei shetar require a shevah pruta? The Ran presents two approaches to the Rif's position. The shiur develops the Ran's second pshat that shetar kiddushin functions as a hachnah (exchange) rather than a mere kinyan nesina. This reading has profound implications for isuri hana'ah, mechubar, and the relationship between kesef and shetar.
