A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why did Rav Rehumi die when he merely came home late from his studies? The shiur develops a yesod that marital obligations grow proportionally with each spouse's investment and sacrifice. True shalom bayis requires reaching for tomorrow's deeper connection today, creating holiness through selflessness rather than ritual alone.
This shiur presents a profound analysis of shalom bayis (peace in the home) through the lens of Talmudic stories and halachic principles. Rabbi Zweig begins with the troubling story of Rav Rehumi from Kesubos 62b, who died when he came home late after being away studying for a year, causing his wife distress. Rather than viewing this as an impossibly harsh standard, Rabbi Zweig explains that the level of obligation between spouses corresponds to their level of mutual devotion and sacrifice. The shiur develops this theme through the story of Rabbi Akiva and his wife, where her extraordinary sacrifice (selling her hair so he could study) created a correspondingly high level of obligation for him to show appreciation and reciprocate. This illustrates that love and marital obligations are not static but grow proportionally with the investment each spouse makes in the relationship.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Kesubos 62b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
