No community start suggestion yet.
Why would someone be reluctant to burn chametz found on Pesach (פסח) but willing to nullify it beforehand? Rashi (רש"י) argues that finding chametz creates a biblical obligation to burn it, making the person psychologically reluctant in a way that undermines sincere pre-Pesach bitul. Tosafos (תוספות) counters that reluctance to give up chametz should affect both burning and nullification equally.
This shiur provides a detailed analysis of Pesachim 6b, focusing on a fundamental disagreement between Rashi (רש"י) and Tosafos (תוספות) regarding bitul chametz and the obligations when chametz is found during Pesach (פסח). The Gemara (גמרא) discusses the case of someone who might find chametz on Pesach after having performed bedikah (search for chametz) and questions whether he would be willing to nullify it. Rashi's position is that the person would be 'kashe lo l'saref' (find it difficult to burn) the chametz because once found on Pesach, there is an obligation to physically destroy it, not merely nullify it. This creates a psychological reluctance that undermines the sincerity of any pre-Pesach bitul. Tosafos challenges this, arguing that if the person is already reluctant to burn chametz, why would he be more willing to nullify it, since both actions involve giving up the chametz.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Pesachim 6b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!