No community start suggestion yet.
When determining if a woman may remain married to her husband, which principle applies — bori (certainty) or chazakah (presumptive status)? Rashi (רש"י) argues that by a ketana (minor), bori has no weight since she lacks discriminating ability, so the hetter must work through chazakah alone. This reading resolves Tosafos (תוספות)'s difficulties about why the Gemara (גמרא) doesn't invoke bori in both the hava amina and maskanah.
The shiur analyzes a complex sugya in Kesubos regarding the principles that permit a woman to remain married when there are questions about her husband's status. The central debate revolves around whether the halachic permission operates through the principle of bori (certainty of statement) or chazakah (presumptive status). Rashi (רש"י)'s position is that the entire sugya does not rely on bori at all, neither in the hava amina nor the maskanah. His reasoning is based on the case involving a ketana (minor girl). Since a ketana lacks the intellectual capacity for discriminating judgment, her statement cannot carry the weight of bori. Additionally, she cannot be considered "isha bodekes umazanah" (a woman who examines and is careful), which would be necessary for that principle to apply.
Looking for the full summary?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
Why does halacha forbid entering dangerous places if everything happens by Divine decree? The shiur examines the debate between Rashi and Tosfos on traveling at night, developing a fundamental distinction: Rashi holds one must avoid even deserved punishments that Hashem delays through mercy, while Tosfos holds the prohibition addresses self-inflicted harm through free will. This framework reveals how people rationalize self-destructive behavior as "hashgacha."
Why does the Gemara praise hospitality to scholars as a unique mitzvah rather than ordinary hachnasas orchim? The shiur distinguishes two mitzvahs: hachnasas orchim (providing for those in need) and connecting to talmidei chachamim (cleaving to God through scholars). Yisro's meal for the Jewish leaders wasn't charity—it was his way of bonding with those transformed by Torah, teaching that learning must fundamentally change who we are.
Kesubos 14a-15a
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
