A free account is required to play audio and download files.
No community start suggestion yet.
Why can brachos for certain mitzvos like tevilah be made after the action, violating 'over la'asiyatan'? The shiur develops a fundamental distinction between making brachos on the ma'aseh hamitzvah (physical action) versus the kiyum hamitzvah (complete fulfillment). When the mitzvah (מצוה) isn't fully complete, like lulav before na'anuim or kiddushin before nisuin, 'over la'asiyatan' is preserved.
This shiur analyzes Tosafos (תוספות) on Pesachim 7b regarding the principle of 'over la'asiyatan' - making brachos before performing the mitzvah (מצוה) action. The Gemara (גמרא) discusses why certain mitzvos like tevilah are exceptions to this rule, with brachos made afterwards. Rabbi Zweig examines Tosafos' complex questions about lulav, where one appears to fulfill the mitzvah upon picking it up, yet still needs to perform na'anuim (waving). Tosafos asks how one can make the bracha 'al netilas lulav' if already yotzei the mitzvah, answering that since na'anuim are still required, it's considered 'over la'asiyatan.' The shiur explores a fundamental distinction between two types of halachic requirements: hilchos brachos (bracha must be chal on something) versus hilchos mitzvos (cannot do mitzvah without bracha). This leads to analyzing whether brachos are made on the ma'aseh hamitzvah (physical action) or the kiyum hamitzvah (fulfillment). The discussion extends to other mitzvos like milah and kiddushin, where brachos are made after certain actions. The Raavad and Rambam (רמב"ם) disagree about erusin - whether brachos are made before or after, relating to whether someone else's involvement affects the timing. Rabbi Zweig explains the Ritva's position that by kiddushin, the bracha is made after the ma'aseh but before complete kiyum, since nisuin is still required. This maintains 'over la'asiyatan' since the mitzvah isn't fully complete. The shiur concludes by examining how these principles apply practically to various mitzvos, establishing when brachos can be made after actions without violating the requirement to make them beforehand.
Pesachim 7b
Looking for the full transcript?
Full access is available to members of the TUF Alumni Association or the Yam Hagadol Foundation.
Already a member? Let the admin know!
Dedicate a Shiur in Gemara
L'ilui nishmas a loved one. In honor of a simcha or yahrzeit. As a zechus for a refuah sheleimah. Your dedication helps carry Rabbi Zweig's Torah to learners around the world.
When an animal damages crops, the Torah prescribes a unique payment formula based on multiplying the damaged area by sixty. Does this formula redefine the actual loss, or does it merely create a payment mechanism that still acknowledges the full damage sustained? The Gemara explores whether someone who ate in doubt should pay the higher-quality amount, examining how the principle of motzi me-chaveiro alav haraya applies when payments fall within the range of actual loss.
What makes testimony valid when different witnesses testify to different parts of the same event? The Gemara debates whether the principle of "davar v'lo chatzi davar" (complete testimony, not partial) disqualifies witnesses who testify separately to theft and slaughter. Rashi's approach reveals that the issue is not merely combining elements, but whether each witness's statement is independently meaningful.
Why is a ganav who sells a stolen animal on Shabbos exempt from the fourfold/fivefold payment? The shiur analyzes whether this exemption stems from kam lei b'derabbah or from the absence of a valid mechira. The Rashba's principle that matana resembles mechira when it is "nishtarish b'chet" is explored, along with the Rambam's position on hekdesh and the distinction between giving to bedek habayis versus mizbe'ach.
When a ganav shechts a stolen animal l'avodah zarah, why isn't he patur from payment since it's already isur hana'ah? The shiur explores the fundamental machloket Rashi-Tosafot on whether the isur derives from the act of shechita or from the din shechita itself. The Gemara's application of davar garem be'mamon ke'mamon domi extends the analysis to when borrowed animals become niskal.
